MFI Throttle body ID

For classic Porsche 911 content

Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Barry, Viv_Surby, Derek, Mike Usiskin

Post Reply
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

MFI Throttle body ID

Post by 1972_911t »

Can anyone ID me some MFI throttle bodies, they have a 38mm inlet and a 36mm port size, there stamped 02 03 079.

There supposed to be from a 2.2S can anyone confirm this?

Thanks Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18010
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Post by Lightweight_911 »

All S throttle bodies - 2.0/2.2/2.4 - have those same dimensions.

Can you post a picture ?
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by 1972_911t »

Image

Image

Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18010
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Post by Lightweight_911 »

Those look like 2.4S throttle bodies & 2.2 magnesium stacks...

- not a problem though - they will work together.

Is the diameter of the bottom of the stacks also 38mm ? If so, then they're 2.2S stacks.
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by 1972_911t »

Yes the bottom of the stacks is 38mm also. Ive just been looking at some pics of 2.2 tb's and they dont have the lower brace between the bodies so these as you say must be 2.4. The problem is I was hoping to have these bored out to work on a 3.2 which supposedly can only be done on 69 - 71 tb's. I dont think these have enough material on them :cry:

Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
davidppp
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:51 pm

Post by davidppp »

Hello, Steve.

Depens what you want to achieve really:

The real advantage of ITB's is to allow a big lumpy cam..and this will obviously demand lotsa air.

Simple geometry would suggest that to provide 3.2L with the same intake area/per Litre of capacity as the 2.0S for example would imply a diameter of 52mm.

(This onviously negelects lots of important aerodynamic effects..such as Boundary layer etc..)

The Real Reason why most folk fit these ITB's of course is to look and sound cool..MFI is uber-cool in the Porche Fashion stakes just now..

If all you want is ITB, for EFI, and a big intake, bore out a pair of old Zeniths..much more meat and cheap...

Kind regards
David
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by 1972_911t »

Hi David

Henry from supertec says he can get the mag intake stacks to 52mm, and the throttle bodies to 41.5mm at the bottom with a 44mm butterfly as he says there wouldnt be much point going bigger than this because ultimately your limited by the 41.5mm port and 49mm valve.

Back to the drawing board!

Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
Mike Usiskin
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1038
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: SE London
Contact:

Post by Mike Usiskin »

HI David,

"The Real Reason why most folk fit these ITB's of course is to look and sound cool..MFI is uber-cool in the Porche Fashion stakes just now.. "

Why So?

regards

Mike
former owner, still hoping to be reunited with my STOLEN 1972 911T/E 2.4 . Keep looking guys

No Hydrocarbons were hurt in the sending of this mail. Thanks


#1315
Post Reply