MFI Throttle body ID
Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Barry, Viv_Surby, Derek, Mike Usiskin
-
1972_911t
- DDK forever
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
MFI Throttle body ID
Can anyone ID me some MFI throttle bodies, they have a 38mm inlet and a 36mm port size, there stamped 02 03 079.
There supposed to be from a 2.2S can anyone confirm this?
Thanks Steve
There supposed to be from a 2.2S can anyone confirm this?
Thanks Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
-
Lightweight_911
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 18011
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: Worcs/W Mids border
-
Lightweight_911
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 18011
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: Worcs/W Mids border
Those look like 2.4S throttle bodies & 2.2 magnesium stacks...
- not a problem though - they will work together.
Is the diameter of the bottom of the stacks also 38mm ? If so, then they're 2.2S stacks.
- not a problem though - they will work together.
Is the diameter of the bottom of the stacks also 38mm ? If so, then they're 2.2S stacks.
Andy
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
-
1972_911t
- DDK forever
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Yes the bottom of the stacks is 38mm also. Ive just been looking at some pics of 2.2 tb's and they dont have the lower brace between the bodies so these as you say must be 2.4. The problem is I was hoping to have these bored out to work on a 3.2 which supposedly can only be done on 69 - 71 tb's. I dont think these have enough material on them
Steve
Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
-
davidppp
- DDK rules my life!
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:51 pm
Hello, Steve.
Depens what you want to achieve really:
The real advantage of ITB's is to allow a big lumpy cam..and this will obviously demand lotsa air.
Simple geometry would suggest that to provide 3.2L with the same intake area/per Litre of capacity as the 2.0S for example would imply a diameter of 52mm.
(This onviously negelects lots of important aerodynamic effects..such as Boundary layer etc..)
The Real Reason why most folk fit these ITB's of course is to look and sound cool..MFI is uber-cool in the Porche Fashion stakes just now..
If all you want is ITB, for EFI, and a big intake, bore out a pair of old Zeniths..much more meat and cheap...
Kind regards
David
Depens what you want to achieve really:
The real advantage of ITB's is to allow a big lumpy cam..and this will obviously demand lotsa air.
Simple geometry would suggest that to provide 3.2L with the same intake area/per Litre of capacity as the 2.0S for example would imply a diameter of 52mm.
(This onviously negelects lots of important aerodynamic effects..such as Boundary layer etc..)
The Real Reason why most folk fit these ITB's of course is to look and sound cool..MFI is uber-cool in the Porche Fashion stakes just now..
If all you want is ITB, for EFI, and a big intake, bore out a pair of old Zeniths..much more meat and cheap...
Kind regards
David
-
1972_911t
- DDK forever
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Hi David
Henry from supertec says he can get the mag intake stacks to 52mm, and the throttle bodies to 41.5mm at the bottom with a 44mm butterfly as he says there wouldnt be much point going bigger than this because ultimately your limited by the 41.5mm port and 49mm valve.
Back to the drawing board!
Steve
Henry from supertec says he can get the mag intake stacks to 52mm, and the throttle bodies to 41.5mm at the bottom with a 44mm butterfly as he says there wouldnt be much point going bigger than this because ultimately your limited by the 41.5mm port and 49mm valve.
Back to the drawing board!
Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
-
Mike Usiskin
- DDK rules my life!
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:26 pm
- Location: SE London
- Contact:
HI David,
"The Real Reason why most folk fit these ITB's of course is to look and sound cool..MFI is uber-cool in the Porche Fashion stakes just now.. "
Why So?
regards
Mike
"The Real Reason why most folk fit these ITB's of course is to look and sound cool..MFI is uber-cool in the Porche Fashion stakes just now.. "
Why So?
regards
Mike
former owner, still hoping to be reunited with my STOLEN 1972 911T/E 2.4 . Keep looking guys
No Hydrocarbons were hurt in the sending of this mail. Thanks
#1315
No Hydrocarbons were hurt in the sending of this mail. Thanks
#1315



