Page 1 of 1
rear shocks
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:55 pm
by hot66
I'm pretty sure a 2.4S left the factory with Koni rear shocks or is my memory fading?
If so where is good place to get soem replacments & how much are they?
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:16 pm
by Nick Moss
Konis are now very hard to get hold of and I think are virtually made to order. I get mine from Roger Bray, he may even have a set in stock for a 73 as I returned some recently. They didn't fit the Ferryman 72S as there was a design change around then.
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:28 pm
by davidppp
Hello again.
Koni today is a very very differnet business from back in the day..its US owned I belive, and Service is not high on the agenda..rumour has that Quality is not what it was either..
I do have an excellent pair of used ones, if that helps.
They are in perfect working order, seemingly low mileage, and should be like new with just some cosmetic paint....
Kind regards
David
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 5:01 pm
by 1972_911t
Type 911 sells them 112 each but they only lists them as 69-71, but 69-72 on the fronts.
Steve
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 7:07 pm
by stuby
I just bought a pair - they are now sold under the name of Koni Classics. - about 150 quid for the pair i recall - will dig the invoice out and check.
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:16 pm
by hot66
what performance shocks is everyone else using?
Bilsteins?
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:44 pm
by Ian Donkin
hot66 wrote:what performance shocks is everyone else using?
Bilsteins?
Yup!
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:51 am
by Gary71
Bilstein...
No direct ride/handling comparision to the previous fitment (Konis) as the rears had no oil in them
However I would say the damping is very well judged for the weight of the car and still a perfectly acceptable ride. Recommended
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:11 am
by Vic Cohen
I went straight for Bilstein gas filled all round on my S , most other suspension parts needed replacing and suspension could have been politely described as tired!
After all they were standard kit on 2.7 rs and although are that little bit firmer the extra predictable control i feel the gas gives is well worth the small loss in comfort.............think they last for ages from memory .
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:08 pm
by hot66
Vic Cohen wrote:I went straight for Bilstein gas filled all round on my S , most other suspension parts needed replacing and suspension could have been politely described as tired!
After all they were standard kit on 2.7 rs and although are that little bit firmer the extra predictable control i feel the gas gives is well worth the small loss in comfort.............think they last for ages from memory .
Vic, where did you get them from?
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:13 pm
by Vic Cohen
Steve at Jaz got them for me 0208 903 1118 , less than i had expected!
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:36 pm
by davidppp
Hello all.
To be honest its debatable whether gas filled is any better for the road..as opposed to race or rally.
It is intended to reduce foaming which is not an issue except in very extreme use..
And Konis are adjustable..and do last very very well despite abuse..
But there is a question mark about the current Koni stuff I'm told..
Kind regads
David
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:48 pm
by MdR
My S has Koni Classics & I have very composed damping. The driver may have no clue but the suspension does exactly what it ought.
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:05 pm
by hot66
MdR wrote:My S has Koni Classics & I have very composed damping. The driver may have no clue but the suspension does exactly what it ought.
I'm going to wait until all the buses have been changed & then see if the shocks need doing