Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Nige
- matteo68
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:43 am
- Location: Caversfield, Bicester, UK
Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Can anyone advise what is correct for ‘72 MY please? I think they should be magnesium but I’ve discovered my S has later turbo ones fitted and I’d like to replace them but I understand the mag ones are prone to warping and leaking and that the later aluminium SC ones are better and can be cerakoted to look correct?
Any advice please?
Any advice please?
Last edited by matteo68 on Sun Jul 21, 2024 11:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
'72 T 210 2176 (ex-Hawaii donor car for '72 M491 2.5 SR)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
-
Lightweight_911
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 17999
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: Worcs/W Mids border
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
.
Original fitment would have been magnesium - which, as you rightly state, are subject to warping/distortion - hence why many people replace them with 'Turbo' covers since that was the Factory's solution ...
.
Original fitment would have been magnesium - which, as you rightly state, are subject to warping/distortion - hence why many people replace them with 'Turbo' covers since that was the Factory's solution ...
.
Andy
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
-
RobFrost
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 8:18 am
- Location: Lichfield
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
I believe the issue is threefold.
The cam towers are aluminium, so if you use the magnesium covers, they expand and contract at a different rate to the aluminium, making them leak over time. If you want it correct then in theory a thicker, softer, flexible gasket would be sufficient to allow the two to expand differently. Some people swear by reusable silicone gaskets, other people have used them and hated them.
Next, the magnesium ones get out of flat so the gasket face needs flattening with abrasive on a flat surface.
Finally, the rocker shafts leak. You can add a little rubber seal to the splits on the rocker shafts, which reduces or eliminates leakage along the rocker shafts.
I noticed my 1970 911T has later covers added, while the 2.2E engine I'm rebuilding has the original magnesium ones. In their defence, they are nice and light.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
The cam towers are aluminium, so if you use the magnesium covers, they expand and contract at a different rate to the aluminium, making them leak over time. If you want it correct then in theory a thicker, softer, flexible gasket would be sufficient to allow the two to expand differently. Some people swear by reusable silicone gaskets, other people have used them and hated them.
Next, the magnesium ones get out of flat so the gasket face needs flattening with abrasive on a flat surface.
Finally, the rocker shafts leak. You can add a little rubber seal to the splits on the rocker shafts, which reduces or eliminates leakage along the rocker shafts.
I noticed my 1970 911T has later covers added, while the 2.2E engine I'm rebuilding has the original magnesium ones. In their defence, they are nice and light.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
1970 911T, Signal orange (Restoration thread)
1988 3.2 Carrera backdate, Black
2001 996 Turbo, Lapis blue (am I allowed to put that here?)
I'm looking for a pre-impact bumper 911S or other high-revving 911 to restore - please let me know if you see one.
1988 3.2 Carrera backdate, Black
2001 996 Turbo, Lapis blue (am I allowed to put that here?)
I'm looking for a pre-impact bumper 911S or other high-revving 911 to restore - please let me know if you see one.
- matteo68
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:43 am
- Location: Caversfield, Bicester, UK
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Thanks both. Maybe I should just live with the turbo ones but my OCD will struggle with that!



'72 T 210 2176 (ex-Hawaii donor car for '72 M491 2.5 SR)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
-
stretch
- Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 2:54 pm
- Location: Kent
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Matt.... Do you wear 72 period pants when you drive it. 
70T barn find...... to ST.
1998 C2 996 Kettle
1998 C2 996 Kettle
-
anglophone1
- I need to get out more!
- Posts: 3273
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:35 pm
- Location: West Cork,Ireland
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Of course he will- ask me how I know?
Clive
West Cork, Ireland
RGruppe #814
1978 SC/1984 3.2 Outlaw -Jaffa 911
1973 914 - on Webers - historic rally car- Tango 914
1977 924 2.0 on Webers street legal race car - Martini 924
1975 911/Flachbau 930 clone- too cool for school!
West Cork, Ireland
RGruppe #814
1978 SC/1984 3.2 Outlaw -Jaffa 911
1973 914 - on Webers - historic rally car- Tango 914
1977 924 2.0 on Webers street legal race car - Martini 924
1975 911/Flachbau 930 clone- too cool for school!
- matteo68
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:43 am
- Location: Caversfield, Bicester, UK
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Yup got it in one Dave!stretch wrote:Matt.... Do you wear 72 period pants when you drive it.

'72 T 210 2176 (ex-Hawaii donor car for '72 M491 2.5 SR)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
-
RobFrost
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 8:18 am
- Location: Lichfield
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
This is one of the rocker shaft solutions, although there are cheaper and simpler ones. But I think your engine is built already.
https://www.neilbainbridge.com/Products ... ealing-Kit
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
https://www.neilbainbridge.com/Products ... ealing-Kit
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
1970 911T, Signal orange (Restoration thread)
1988 3.2 Carrera backdate, Black
2001 996 Turbo, Lapis blue (am I allowed to put that here?)
I'm looking for a pre-impact bumper 911S or other high-revving 911 to restore - please let me know if you see one.
1988 3.2 Carrera backdate, Black
2001 996 Turbo, Lapis blue (am I allowed to put that here?)
I'm looking for a pre-impact bumper 911S or other high-revving 911 to restore - please let me know if you see one.
- matteo68
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:43 am
- Location: Caversfield, Bicester, UK
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Yes built already Rob, but thanks and I may mention this to Sam next time I see him anyway
'72 T 210 2176 (ex-Hawaii donor car for '72 M491 2.5 SR)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
-
Gary71
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 10726
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 1:27 pm
- Location: Cheshire
- Contact:
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
It will struggle more when they leak oil everywhere… my ‘72 magnesium originals were warped, and even after being machined flat again they still leaked.matteo68 wrote:Thanks both. Maybe I should just live with the turbo ones but my OCD will struggle with that!
- matteo68
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:43 am
- Location: Caversfield, Bicester, UK
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Am I right in thinking the later alu SC ones look the same as the mag ones?
'72 T 210 2176 (ex-Hawaii donor car for '72 M491 2.5 SR)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
-
Lightweight_911
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 17999
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: Worcs/W Mids border
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
.
Yes, the diecast aluminium valve covers look the same ...
.
Yes, the diecast aluminium valve covers look the same ...
.
Andy
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
- matteo68
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:43 am
- Location: Caversfield, Bicester, UK
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
Ok, thanks Andy! In that case does anyone have a couple of pairs please?!
'72 T 210 2176 (ex-Hawaii donor car for '72 M491 2.5 SR)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
'72 S 230 0347 (unrestored, concours-winning Tangerine unicorn)
-
RobFrost
- DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 8:18 am
- Location: Lichfield
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
These are the ones I'd say. Based on them looking the same as my mag ones.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/385032586904
But I assume yours need drilling for the twin plugging?
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/385032586904
But I assume yours need drilling for the twin plugging?
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
1970 911T, Signal orange (Restoration thread)
1988 3.2 Carrera backdate, Black
2001 996 Turbo, Lapis blue (am I allowed to put that here?)
I'm looking for a pre-impact bumper 911S or other high-revving 911 to restore - please let me know if you see one.
1988 3.2 Carrera backdate, Black
2001 996 Turbo, Lapis blue (am I allowed to put that here?)
I'm looking for a pre-impact bumper 911S or other high-revving 911 to restore - please let me know if you see one.
- hot66
- Moderator
- Posts: 19224
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
- Location: North Yorkshire
Re: Correct lower valve covers for ‘72 MY
I have my mag ones in storage as they had a mild warp .. even after flattening and rubber gaskets they leaked. I’ve got later alloys ones fitted these days .
James
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1963 Honda C100 Supercub
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast

