MFI Intake Value

For classic Porsche 911 content

Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Barry, Viv_Surby, Derek, Mike Usiskin

Post Reply
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

MFI Intake Value

Post by 1972_911t »

I’ve recently bought a set of MFI intakes to use for an engine project, they were sold to me as 2.2 E intakes with the mag stacks, I wanted these as they are the best for boring to the size I need. However when they have arrived they have turned out to be 2.0 intakes from a 69E. These can still be bored out to the desired size however the stacks have a thinner wall which means after boring I will be left with a 2.5 to 3mm thick wall which is not really ideal. The other option is to sell these and get another more suitable set. What sort of price does the 2.0 sets fetch compared to the 2.2 and 2.4 stuff? Is it comparable?

Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
johnM
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3397
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:27 pm
Location: Lake District

MFI

Post by johnM »

Hi Steve

the 2.4 stacks are plastic so cannot be bored.
I also recall a thread about 2.0 throttle bodies having a different stud spacing, i just wondered if this ment that the stacks would also have different stud spacing making them non interchagable with 2.2 stuff.

Regards
John
1970 2.2E Coupe.
2004 996 GT3 mkII
2015 Skoda Octavia VRS TSI DSG.
2021 Toyota GR Yaris Circuit Pack
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by 1972_911t »

Hi John

The stack to throttle body stud spacing is different on the 2.0 to the 2.2 and 2.4 stuff this is why the 2.0 mag stacks are thinner walled to the 2.2 mag stacks as the studs are closer and hence need to be kept as a matched set. Thats why im considering selling this set to buy the thicker walled 2.2 setup. I just wanted an Idea of what price the earlier stuff goes for compared to the later ones.

Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
davidppp
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:51 pm

Post by davidppp »

Hello, Steve.

The 2.2 mag stacks are obviously in demand for this reason: so a bit more, but finding them may be the main issue, I may have a set of 2.2E stacks with bodies spare....give me an email and we can sort something I'm sure.

What size are you planning to bore to?

david.leopold at virgin.net

Kind regards
David
davidppp
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 9:51 pm

Post by davidppp »

PS plastic stackas can be bored, but maybe you want reall big?

Kind regards
David
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18013
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Post by Lightweight_911 »

Just for clarification, the plastic stacks can be bored - eg the T stacks can be bored to S specs.
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18013
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Post by Lightweight_911 »

- David beat me to it!
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by 1972_911t »

davidppp wrote:PS plastic stackas can be bored, but maybe you want reall big?

Kind regards
David
Yeah too big for the plastic ones, im wanting to bore to 42mm on the bottom of the stack and 48 on the top. Eurometrix in the states say they can bore these earlier mag stacks to this spec but this is leaving only a 3mm thick wall. The later 2.2 ones are 5mm thicker extrenally.

Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
Post Reply