Classic and Rebuild Vehicles Consultation

Chat away, Classic Porsche related or otherwise

Moderators: hot66, Miggs, 58A - 71E, impmad2000, drummerboytom, Barry, Helen, Viv_Surby, Derek, KS, abm914, Mike Usiskin

jtparr
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2366
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: london/surrey

Re: Classic and Rebuild Vehicles Consultation

Post by jtparr »

I did the survey a couple of weeks ago…lets see what’s difference it made…
1974 2.7 Carrera
(full restoration. now as an RS Touring)
1963 3.8 E Type
( 11 years in the making…………………….)
1952. XK120…the next one ……….……..)
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 20708
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: Classic and Rebuild Vehicles Consultation

Post by 911hillclimber »

Better than we all give no response!
The Federation is 27 strong plus consultants, plus others are standing up.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
Bruce M
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 1:07 pm

Classic and Rebuild Vehicles Consultation

Post by Bruce M »

Government summary of responses has now been published.

Dig in!

https://assets.publishing.service.gov. ... report.pdf
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 20708
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: Classic and Rebuild Vehicles Consultation

Post by 911hillclimber »

I have wondered about this action since the election.
I thought the issue had been 'lost' in Government...

I've looked quickly through all 33 pages; a lot to be taken in, but looks like DVLA and others have looked carefully at the disappointing response number.
Responses to me seem very low at around 1300 for the whole nation.

However, all this is just working out the % of who said what to which question, some of which are quite complicated to understand, so people simply did not answer as a result.

The killer crunch is what follows, no time scale given so carry on regardless.

For me it shows it has been looked at in some depth, but also the whole topic has been kept far too complicated.

Thanks for posting Bruce, I await to read what other organisations say to it all.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
rhd racer
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2565
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: Classic and Rebuild Vehicles Consultation

Post by rhd racer »

The body of opinion seems to be behind the existing rules with some tweaks - it is not exactly overwhelming call to action! The monocoque mod section seems to be the closest to sensible


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
93 964 C2
99 Boxster 2.5 > 3.4 hill climber

71 914/6 3.0 - gone

'You see Paul, hill climbing is like making love to a beautiful woman. You get your motor running, check your fluids, hang on tight and WHOA..30 seconds later it's all over!' Swiss Tony
Post Reply