The 'Maverick' Classic Porsche Forum and Classic Porsche Club for Porsche 356, Aircooled Porsche 911, Porsche 912, Porsche 914 & Porsche Replicas. 'We join for the cars but stay for the people'
I have well oiled K&N filters on my hillclimb flat 6 3.2 engine, and I'm interested to collect any views and experiences about other filters, ie ITG.
Anyone with any thoughts please?
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
The risk of swallowing kitty litter at many venues I do is too high, also the junks all over the car when towing.
I think ITG are a good bet as they do a 911 special, but there may be others.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
I have ITGs on a 2.7 with high butterflies. The filters do not have any covers over them to restrict air flow. I have rain shields on the engine lid grill. I purchased thr ITG system from Tech9 who provides a simple flat housing for them to sit on which has large grommets to hold the assembly onto the injection tracts. Darren65 I think has the same kit on his Mongrel. Phil, who owns Tech9 uses the same set up on his personal car. He says that the power loss using his ITG set up is around 6bhp. No data to back that up.
I know you will not consider it but turn off the fan for the run!!
Sent from my M2004J19C using Tapatalk
“A REMINDER. I would be grateful if those members who have borrowed bits from me in emergencies (e.g starter motor, oil cooler, etc) would return them and/or contact me”. – Chris Turner RIP
If that was a good idea it would have been done before?
In a 40 second run this engine will rise a good 15 deg C on it's own let alone being forced into a higher temp or a more rapid rise.
I think I'll go slower and enjoy the reliability!
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
“A REMINDER. I would be grateful if those members who have borrowed bits from me in emergencies (e.g starter motor, oil cooler, etc) would return them and/or contact me”. – Chris Turner RIP
911hillclimber wrote:Difficult to work out, everyone who makes these things claim improvements.
Might get a better bang for the buck from bigger choke diameters.
Agree Graham. I did not have the ITGs when the engine was on the dyno rig so could not make a comparative test.
After a lot of conversations with cleaver people this last weekend on this subject, plan is to make some 40.5mm chokes and take the car so equipped to the RR and see what happens at the end of the season.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9