That combined with an 18mm anti roll bar must have been scary in such a light car !
I would imagine you'll have a lot more fun driving the car now.
Say hello to David from me.
PS - (another) nice-looking house ...
.
Moderator: Bootsy
Can someone explain why this is bad? Is it because the back end of the car is too stiff with a wider torsion bar?Lightweight_911 wrote:28mm rear torsion bars![]()
![]()
![]()
That combined with an 18mm anti roll bar must have been scary in such a light car !
I would imagine you'll have a lot more fun driving the car now.
Say hello to David from me.
PS - (another) nice-looking house ...![]()
.
Holy crap Batman! There must have been no flex at all in the car. Bet it's a world of difference now....jury wrote: Front torsion bar - 18mm
Rear torsion bar - 28mm

Pretty much solid then in a 850kg carBruce M wrote:Also, for interest.
Torsion bar Spring rates increase by the fourth power of the diameter change. So small increases in diameter rapidly increases the spring rate.
Increase from 23mm to 28mm = (1+((28-23)/23))^4% increase in spring rate (all other factors being equal). Which works out as 220% increase or 2.2 times.
Roll bar change from 15mm to 18mm is a 207% increase in stiffness (Spring rate).
So what you saying ?Bruce M wrote:Also, for interest.
Torsion bar Spring rates increase by the fourth power of the diameter change. So small increases in diameter rapidly increases the spring rate.
Increase from 23mm to 28mm = (1+((28-23)/23))^4% increase in spring rate (all other factors being equal). Which works out as 220% increase or 2.2 times.
Roll bar change from 15mm to 18mm is a 207% increase in stiffness (Spring rate).












