"Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Ongoing and archived Porsche (and other marques) restoration threads from DDK members

Moderator: Bootsy

gav p
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 463
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: SW London

"Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by gav p »

So, I have finally got around to posting something about my winter project. Flikr seem to have done a great job of making it as difficult as possible to post photos these days :evil: ... but I think I have finally re-learnt how to make them work.

Anyway, about the project.... the 911E has been very slowly evolving over the years as time has permitted, with a general plan of creating a "hotrod sleeper" - sleeper because the original bodywork, trim and interior are pretty well preserved and are worth not messing around with. But for me it's really all about the driving, I want to bring out the maximum performance potential with some sensible mods, although all changes are "reversable".

The car currently looks like this - as pictured with Will B's red targa S -

Image

It already has bilsteins, aluminium rear arm conversion, 3.2 front calipers etc, so now it is time for some more power :wink:

This green US car is the closest I have so far seen to my vision for my car - mine would be less extreme in terms of running spec, but appearance wise I see a lot to aspire to... 8)

Image

So, back to the winter project: I have been wanting to carry out an engine rebuild for quite a while - my 2.4E motor is matching numbers for my car, but has now coverered about 110,000 miles and, at 40 years old is showing its age. The oil leaks have really got out of control, in particular the crankshaft "0" ring around the bearing carrier at the pulley end is thought to be leaking, and that means splitting the case... The engine has never run particularly smoothly regardless of countless tune-ups of the MFI and ignition, throttle body rebuild, distributor rebuild, MFI pump rebuild etc etc, so the condition of the top end is really in question; leak-down tests show 15-17% leakage on all cylinders, and there is some evidence of valve guide wear - noise, burning oil etc.

This winter I finally have some time to put together a new engine which will deliver extra performance, but also remain practical for everyday use - the car needs to be as useable in London traffic dropping my son off to nursery as it is for early sunday blasts and the occasional track day...

So, I am planning to put together an E-cammed MFI engine on steroids - the E-cams giving the famous midrange torque for general all-round driveability, but increased capacity and compression ratio for extra punch. I am also pondering twin-plug...

As discussed elsewhere by others on this forum, to increase capacity of the 2.4 engine to 2.7L requires machining of the crankcase to accommodate the larger diameter cylinders. This is all very well, but I have decided that I would prefer to keep my matching-numbers crankcase intact. Therefore, a couple of years ago I picked up a '74 2.7L CIS motor from a fellow DDK'er, which has been waiting in storage for the project to begin. The photo below is the engine as I bought it - not a particularly pretty sight :shock: It had already been stripped of anciliaries but came with all the CIS and CDI parts including 3-PIN CDI box and black coil -

Image

I had no information regarding the history or condition of this engine, other than that it turned over by hand and was complete. There was talk of it having spent some time installed in a VW camper, and being a 2.7L US-spec motor with 9-blade fan, the prognosis for it's overall condition is not great....

However, the plan is to strip the CIS motor, recondition and repair wherever necessary and rebuild it as a 2.7 MFI engine. This would include new pistons and appropriate machining work to the heads for use with MFI injectors. E-cams will be used, either from my current engine or re-grinding the CIS cams. I'll also use the complete MFI and other anciliaries from my current engine. I am carrying out the strip-down and rebuild myself, but will be leaving the machining work to the experts :)

Current thinking on the spec is something like this -

New high-comp pistons
CR~ 10:1 if single-plug
911E cams
911E throttle bodies
shuffle pin case
boat-tail case and cylinders
re-plate 2.7L cylinders
rebuild E MFI pump to fuel increased capacity
lighten flywheel (not too much though)
external oil cooler

It would of course be interesting to hear what others think of this spec. As mentioned above, I'm also not ruling out twin-plug at this stage, although I do want to avoid unnecessary complexity which might compromise reliability or useability.

As of today, the 2.7CIS engine is ready for strip-down - with engine-stand kindly donated by Chris Turner - thanks Chris :)

Image

As you can see, there's plenty of surface corrosion and general grime from all that time out of use. I will be dismantling it over the next few days, so it will be interesting to see what internal condition it's in...

That's all for now, will post updates as I have them.

Cheers,
Gavin

'73 911E -> 2.7mfi
'94 968 Sport
User avatar
Bootsy
Site admin and the Boss
Posts: 25728
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by Bootsy »

Will watch with interest Gav
1972 911T | 1994 993 Carrera | 1999 986 Boxster |

Vintage Heuer, Omega, Zenith and other vintage watches - http://www.heuerheritage.co.uk
Peter
I luv DDK!
Posts: 816
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 5:55 pm
Location: Kingston upon Thames

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by Peter »

Sounds interesting Gav, look forward to seeing how it develops.
Peter
'72 911T
'52 80” Series 1
jtparr
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2366
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: london/surrey

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by jtparr »

Seconded, should be interesting reading...look forward to it Gav

Jp
1974 2.7 Carrera
(full restoration. now as an RS Touring)
1963 3.8 E Type
( 11 years in the making…………………….)
1952. XK120…the next one ……….……..)
johnM
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3398
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:27 pm
Location: Lake District

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by johnM »

Hi Gav

Hope you are all well.

Engine sounds like it will be a corker.

Keep the updates flowing.

Kind regards.
John
1970 2.2E Coupe.
2004 996 GT3 mkII
2015 Skoda Octavia VRS TSI DSG.
2021 Toyota GR Yaris Circuit Pack
impmad2000
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3359
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:31 am
Location: Leicester, a convenient mid point !
Contact:

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by impmad2000 »

Good luck, this will be an interesting project. I reckon you could squeeze John M and my targa between the two in the 1st photo :)
Tim Bennett
RHD Targa 2.2T EFI, Triumph ITB's, EDIS and Megasquirt.
"Old enough to know what's right and young enough not to choose it"
#1153
dizzycap
Married to the DDK
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by dizzycap »

A related question: how do you mount an MFI pump on a cis case? Are the pump mount studs still there on a cis case?
1970 911T Coupe (Sold)
1968 912 Coupe
User avatar
jb
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2568
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: London

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by jb »

Why not go EFI rather than mess around with your E engine especially as you recon it has never worked perfectly?
You would probable get better mpg and maybe similar performance
I watch with interest
#1370
User avatar
silver911
Married to the DDK
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:14 am
Location: London

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by silver911 »

I have a 2.7E engine in my 72 car...
Bob Watson build ( and tune...)
No need for twin plug heads...was his opinion.
It is pretty powerful, with 219bhp on Bob's Rollers and torque above an RS spec engine.
Make sure your rev limiter is in good order and it gets there very quickly in 2 and 3 gear...
Be interesting to see your engine come together
haasad
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2568
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Dorchester

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by haasad »

Excellent project, looking forward to seeing it unfold...
ddk member# 1527
Austin Healey 100/6, 1957 Fast Road ( now sold)
75 2.7 S backdated to "r" and very light (now sold).
Adria Camper
Buddy McCrae kneeboard.
Friar Tuck kneeboard.
Lots of Bicycles.
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 19227
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by hot66 »

Sounds like a perfect spec early mfi motor 8)

Jason is kind of right in one respect, EFI would give you a lot better fuel management .... Even with all we've done to my 2.4 motor, the MFI fueling is still a compromise, I don't loose out on power but it does sit slightly rich than I would like at small throttle openings ( eg, when crushing on the motorway etc)

BUT, mfi is a great period induction system , I wouldn't have it any other way on my car 8)

Re boat tailing, a few different sources told me not to waste my money on getting the case boat tailed when I was realistically looking at not revving beyond 7300
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder

1963 Honda C100 Supercub

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
cubist
The Fenland Feltcher
Posts: 4044
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 12:48 pm

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by cubist »

Aiming for the same ride height and rubber combo as the green loveliness?
C U B I S T - 1 1 1 5

'83 Triumph Acclaim - 3sp Auto (cat D)
Singer 3232 - Titanium bobbin, Autothread
'67 Gresham Flyer - Puncture, rear
Sherbet Lemons - 4oz, loose
Motorola - PG 2000, locked
impmad2000
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3359
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:31 am
Location: Leicester, a convenient mid point !
Contact:

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by impmad2000 »

I see no reason why you can't fit EFI injectors with MFI stacks and throttles. Fit adapters into the heads where the MFI injectors go. Boxster fuel rail and injectors have the correct spacing. ECU to sort the fuelling... Just a thought.
.. And I think the CIS throttle assembly bolts to the same place as the MFI pump, so yes the studs are present.
Tim Bennett
RHD Targa 2.2T EFI, Triumph ITB's, EDIS and Megasquirt.
"Old enough to know what's right and young enough not to choose it"
#1153
72911E
I luv DDK!
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:01 am
Location: SW London

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by 72911E »

gav p wrote:
The car currently looks like this - as pictured with Will B's red targa S -

Image
Another Early car that I have seen on the Fulham Palace Road.
'72 911E Coupe RHD
'72 911S Coupe RHD
40 scout
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1170
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:40 pm
Location: Southsea

Re: "Sleeper" hotrod - homebuild 2.7CIS to high comp 2.7 MFI

Post by 40 scout »

Hi Gav

I did similar last year with my clapped out 2.7 CIS but went new PMO route.

After a very bad start I ended up at Neil Bainbridgges who put together a lovely motor.

E cams
9.5 / 1
Ported as reqd

212 bhp on the dyno and a great torque curve.

Go for it.

Steve
'72 911T - 212 BHP 2.7, on PMO's
'62 RHD T6 B outlaw
'71 Alfa GT Veloce 2000

1929 Indian 101 'bobber' project.
'40 Indian Sport Scout bobber
VW T5
!920's Racing Cycle
1920's Premier cycle
A few vintage Heuers

Member No 381
Post Reply