356 restoration question

Porsche 356 Virtual home

Moderators: 58A - 71E, Helen

Post Reply
decapman
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:58 am
Location: Tunbridge Wells

356 restoration question

Post by decapman »

I have read several times now that 356 body restoration isnt straight forward or simple.
Anyone care to enlighten me whats so different?
Marcus
1952 Pre a
1956 356a "die Ratte"
1972 Mercedes 280S
1974 914 2.0
1955 Continental Cabriolet
1968 Citroen DS21 Cabriolet
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18004
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Post by Lightweight_911 »

356's were essentially handmade & used a lot of lead to blend the curves where adjacent panels meet hence virtually everything needs to be 'fettled' to fit.
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
User avatar
Hendrik Moulds
Put a fork in me, I'm done!
Posts: 1654
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:28 am
Location: Burley In Wharfedale, West Yorkshire

Post by Hendrik Moulds »

Thing is if you don't get the door and bonnet shuts perfect with even gaps etc then the car will look terrible.
Unfortunately this is very difficult and time consuming to achieve.
Also because the body is "on piece" in other words no seperate wings and lots of curves it's easy to get wrong. It's not that it's different particularily just hard (and expensive) to get right.
(Formally 356ist)
Membership #: 356!
1953 Cabriolet
1959 Coupe (Sold)
1961 Notchback
1961 Sunroof Coupe (Sold)
1962 Coupe (Gone, but not forgotten!)
ALL RHD OF COURSE!
Rustbucket
DDK forever
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Hove , Brighton
Contact:

Post by Rustbucket »

I did all my own work and its all do-able.
I agree that there is a load of lead work on the original car but that basically means that the pics you see of these amazingly worked all metal repairs at mega bucks are actually better workmanship than what was on the car in the first place!
I've yet to really put my car together properly to check the gaps etc but for me its fine.
I think the main problem is there literally isnt a straight line on the body to work from other than the lower door sill. Most of it is by eye.
As for panels- The sill closing panel I got in was a good 4 inches too long..........scary!
D
Contact me if you have any 356b coupe parts !!!!
decapman
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:58 am
Location: Tunbridge Wells

Post by decapman »

Thanks guys
Marcus
1952 Pre a
1956 356a "die Ratte"
1972 Mercedes 280S
1974 914 2.0
1955 Continental Cabriolet
1968 Citroen DS21 Cabriolet
roy mawbey
Put a fork in me, I'm done!
Posts: 1872
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: sunny sussex

Post by roy mawbey »

Marcus,

Very sensible points by these guys. It does come down to the fact the car is all curves and the body panels are not bolt on. The rigidity is because the body and chassis platform box sections are as one. The underneath and the amount of rust as no doubt you are aware with your early RHD 911S is also important from a working point of view. The body you can work around if you are doing the work yourself because you can get at it, Different case with the underneath! Now days these rotisseries are the thing to have makes life easier. I did mine using a full length pit and all sorts of lifting gear to get at the items to weld. ( and note that even though my car was actually in reasonable condition and still has original battery box, 70% of the original sills with their jacking points it was still a really long job and tiring!)

I now think the best way would be on the spit. So you can see really why people end up paying and just how many hours it can take.

I think most things can be achieved but you really have to want to do it if you are doing the work!

Below a picture of my car from above. It really shows the difficult curves.


[img][img]http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/qq15 ... CF0029.jpg[/img][/img]

As a test for me! I am now entering another photo of my dashboard to see if a second photo is up loaded okay.
[img][img]http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/qq15 ... CF0020.jpg[/img][/img]

Roy
RHD 356A coupe super 75 106954
rocket280
DDK above all
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: watford

Post by rocket280 »

I would say that the restoration of the body is more straight foward than a lot of classic sports cars when you consider the amount of repro panels available.
912uk
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5954
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:02 pm

Post by 912uk »

I have to say with my Pre A I want to do it well and I want to do it once. Much like Roy's car..take the time invest in doing it well and it should reward you with years to come..

Not sure what FH thought I was doing with the car but I am really trying hard to get as sensible to orginal as I can..

at the moment the car is resting on it's side while I wait for warmer weather to get back into the floor resto.. not alot to do but taking my time .. the area I am worried about is this rear of the front wings on both sides a common place to rust.. for a car this old and to have SO very little rust I guess I can't complain really

but with out the spinny thing I made I couldn't do as good a job as scrabbling around under neath..

best thing I ever made I am sure some one will buy it off me afterwards..

Image
Image
funny thing is when it's on it's side it takes up less room in the work shop :lol: :lol:
roy mawbey
Put a fork in me, I'm done!
Posts: 1872
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: sunny sussex

Post by roy mawbey »

Now that is the way to do it!!! I only wish I had that "spinny thing" in the 70's.! It makes everything so much easier. I am sure you will find someone interested in buying that when you are finished.

So right, spend all the time possible to get it to your satisfaction then when you look at it 5 years on its won't niggle you.

Bet that car will look nice when its finished.

Roy
RHD 356A coupe super 75 106954
Post Reply