911 2.7RS

Spydermon · Post by **Spydermon** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:41 pm

Helen wrote:if that dosn't work then its the old, convince him it was all his own idea, and what a wonderful idea it was too .

Ho-hum! I'm thinking that I fall for this one all the time!

......

richkaz · Post by **richkaz** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:18 pm

[quote
Seriously though; and I'd like to throw this out to the DDK ensemble, what excuses do you use to your beloved's (male or female) to justify such expenditure on what are really-speaking toys?

Has anybody else run into the 'Do you know what else we could do with this money.....' type arguments? What do you say? Or has everybody else got understanding spouses, and I really am with the trouble and strife?

[/quote]

Consider it as a pension plan where YOU take responsibity for your investment rather than so called pension fund "experts". Some of these guys take an annual chunk of your savings, pretend they are clever and when they lose your money immediately blame " World market conditions "
If you have any fund left the government reverses its promise never to tax pension funds and taxes yours explaining that "sometimes financial decisions must be made for the greater good of society"

. Faceless pen pushers nick your savings whilst they line there own pockets!

If you keep your toy you can usually sell it and any profits should be TAX FREE ( unless your a dealer ). If you lose money you've experienced the pleasure and fun as well as the kudos of ownership.
Its not a toy its your pension.

Spydermon · Post by **Spydermon** » Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:15 am

richkaz wrote:[quote
Seriously though; and I'd like to throw this out to the DDK ensemble, what excuses do you use to your beloved's (male or female) to justify such expenditure on what are really-speaking toys?

Has anybody else run into the 'Do you know what else we could do with this money.....' type arguments? What do you say? Or has everybody else got understanding spouses, and I really am with the trouble and strife?

Consider it as a pension plan where YOU take responsibity for your investment rather than so called pension fund "experts". Some of these guys take an annual chunk of your savings, pretend they are clever and when they lose your money immediately blame " World market conditions "
If you have any fund left the government reverses its promise never to tax pension funds and taxes yours explaining that "sometimes financial decisions must be made for the greater good of society"

. Faceless pen pushers nick your savings whilst they line there own pockets!

If you keep your toy you can usually sell it and any profits should be TAX FREE ( unless your a dealer ). If you lose money you've experienced the pleasure and fun as well as the kudos of ownership.
Its not a toy its your pension.

[/quote]

"It's not a toy its my pension!"

Brilliant RichKaz! This is my new mantra, and I think that it should be the site logo, or on a sticker perhaps?

You are absolutely right, and I will totally concur with your views on taxation, though I will refrain to comment. Not because I don't want to, no, simply because I will fume and fulminate, and then implode, achieve singularity and become a black hole into another universe!!!!!!!!!

{"...and breathe......."}

Great answer though, thank you,

Steve.

fryardds · Post by **fryardds** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:45 am

Hi Steve,

I certainly enjoyed this thread and your enthusiasm for the '73 Carreras. I look forward to seeing which RS you end up with. Here are a few shots of my RS.

Spydermon · Post by **Spydermon** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:54 am

Hi Brian,

Thanks for posting and the kind comments! Glad you enjoyed it, I certainly have, and the things I have learned have been incredible.

Fantastic pics of your beautiful RS! I've never seen (or noticed?) gold script before, but it really suits the colour, just great! I'm really grateful that you posted them.....but I need more details.....!

Anybody else that wants to add their RS to this thread please do, I really love seeing them in the flesh as it were!

As to which one I will choose; well I'm not short of choice. Buuuuttt, there is one that I am going to see soon that I have promised not to post details of beforehand....I know, I know, sounds like I'm being coy, but I'm not, and I'm respecting the wishes of the owner on this one. As soon as I can post though I will, I promise.

Thanks again for your post Brian, and the great pics!

Steve.

Vic Cohen · Post by **Vic Cohen** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:01 am

Gold script more usually associated with 3 0 rs , infact on all 3 0 rs ! What a lovely car again details like bonnet badge and engine in general spot on..............does happen to be my favourite colour!

Spydermon · Post by **Spydermon** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:14 pm

Vic Cohen wrote:Gold script more usually associated with 3 0 rs , infact on all 3 0 rs ! What a lovely car again details like bonnet badge and engine in general spot on..............does happen to be my favourite colour!

Thanks for that Vic,

I didn't know that, and wouldn't have made that association. Don't think I've seen a 3.0RS, were they later IB cars?

It is a lovely colour, and the gold works well, wonder why Porsche didn't use it with the 2.7RS?

Cheers,

Steve.

Roadrunner · Post by **Roadrunner** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:24 pm

Spydermon wrote:
Vic Cohen wrote:Gold script more usually associated with 3 0 rs , infact on all 3 0 rs ! What a lovely car again details like bonnet badge and engine in general spot on..............does happen to be my favourite colour!
Thanks for that Vic,

I didn't know that, and wouldn't have made that association. Don't think I've seen a 3.0RS, were they later IB cars?

It is a lovely colour, and the gold works well, wonder why Porsche didn't use it with the 2.7RS?

Cheers,

Steve.

Having driven both, in my humble and quite possibly controversial opinion, the 3.0 RS is a better all-round car than the 2.7.

www.fluidimages.co.uk

Lightweight_911 · Post by **Lightweight_911** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:40 pm

Roadrunner wrote:Having driven both, in my humble and quite possibly controversial opinion, the 3.0 RS is a better all-round car than the 2.7.

www.fluidimages.co.uk

Many (most ?) people who have driven both would agree with you Tim.

Spydermon · Post by **Spydermon** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:55 pm

Roadrunner wrote:
Spydermon wrote:
Vic Cohen wrote:Gold script more usually associated with 3 0 rs , infact on all 3 0 rs ! What a lovely car again details like bonnet badge and engine in general spot on..............does happen to be my favourite colour!
Thanks for that Vic,

I didn't know that, and wouldn't have made that association. Don't think I've seen a 3.0RS, were they later IB cars?

It is a lovely colour, and the gold works well, wonder why Porsche didn't use it with the 2.7RS?

Cheers,

Steve.
Having driven both, in my humble and quite possibly controversial opinion, the 3.0 RS is a better all-round car than the 2.7.

www.fluidimages.co.uk

Hi Tim,

I don't think I know this one....? Could you point me at one please?

I don't think I've ever seen (or noticed) one for sale...

Cheers,

Steve.

Spydermon · Post by **Spydermon** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:57 pm

Lightweight_911 wrote:
Roadrunner wrote:Having driven both, in my humble and quite possibly controversial opinion, the 3.0 RS is a better all-round car than the 2.7.

www.fluidimages.co.uk
Many (most ?) people who have driven both would agree with you Tim.

I wouldn't know (yet!), is this a taboo subject that I'm not aware of? Is the 3.0RS IB or not?

Steve.

Spydermon · Post by **Spydermon** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:57 pm

Steve.

hot66 · Post by **hot66** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:57 pm

yes it is

Roadrunner · Post by **Roadrunner** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:00 pm

Spydermon wrote:
Roadrunner wrote:
Spydermon wrote: Thanks for that Vic,

I didn't know that, and wouldn't have made that association. Don't think I've seen a 3.0RS, were they later IB cars?

It is a lovely colour, and the gold works well, wonder why Porsche didn't use it with the 2.7RS?

Cheers,

Steve.
Having driven both, in my humble and quite possibly controversial opinion, the 3.0 RS is a better all-round car than the 2.7.

www.fluidimages.co.uk
Hi Tim,

I don't think I know this one....? Could you point me at one please?

I don't think I've ever seen (or noticed) one for sale...

Cheers,

Steve.

Permission to post a picture of your old car Vic ?

Vic Cohen · Post by **Vic Cohen** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:05 pm

Young Mr Moss has more piccies of mine than i have ........sure he cud oblige ................in a nutshell, 3 0 rs 1974 /5 abt 115 of which 49 were rs and 49 werer rsr , the IMsa cars or some weird derivatives make up highly disputed total, u shud have Starkey book by now Spydermon , not 100% ,but reasonably accurate rs chassis number and even record of owners where known........917 brakes ,semipro kinda race car , rs road legal , rsr, well it cud be, but wider body /wheels and twin plug engine....turn key racer won everything in its day ..............rs today £250 ish rsr depends on where it raced anything .................been dealt around £400k

to compare 2.7 and 3 0 rs ,like for like, say both lightweight ....2.7 light like on tip toe ,3 0 much more neutral suspension ,more planted both IMO the finest porsche driving experience ..................biggest mistake of my life selling it , second biggest mistake not paying up last year and missing buying it back !