Ride height

Need some help with a technical problem - ask away and let's see if we can all help.

Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Nige

FMAN
DDK addict
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Sydney

Ride height

Post by FMAN »

Hi,

I have now finally completed the overhaul of my suspension and have set the ride height to the Haynes manual spec.
There seems to be a lot of people say the standard ride height is Front 25 1/2 and rear 25 inches to the wheel arches. This is about 1 inch lower than my car.
Which is correct?

The tyres are 185/60 x 15.

Regards

Neil
johnM
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3397
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:27 pm
Location: Lake District

Post by johnM »

Hi

The Porsche spec book dosnt give ride height from the wheel arch lip, the spec book for your car will give you the correct settings for ride height and these are a relation between torsion bar centre to floor and wheel centre to floor.

Kind Regards
John
1970 2.2E Coupe.
2004 996 GT3 mkII
2015 Skoda Octavia VRS TSI DSG.
2021 Toyota GR Yaris Circuit Pack
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 19269
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Post by hot66 »

but .... assuming your bodywork is 'even' , then it is generally accepted that standard euro height suspesnion is 25.5 fr, 25 rear ( measured through the centre of the wheel).

USA height was higher.
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder

1963 Honda C100 Supercub

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
FMAN
DDK addict
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by FMAN »

Hi,

Does anyone know what the porsche spec books says for a 72T?


Regards
Neil
210bhp
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 8251
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 210bhp »

Fman

Rear
Torsion bar centre 12mm (plus or minus 5mm) above rear wheel centre

Front
Torsion bar centre 108mm (plus or minus 5mm) below front wheel centre


With standard wheels and tyres with recommended pressures, car unladen.


Regards
Mike the stickman
FMAN
DDK addict
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by FMAN »

Thanks Mike the stickman,

So why does this end up with the front wheel arch being 26.5 and the rear 26? Has anyone got both measurement methods to match?

Regards

Neil
210bhp
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 8251
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 210bhp »

Neil

Because of the different profile of the arch front and rear. Even with what apparently seems to be a higher front end I can assure you it is not. The car still has a level or slightly nose down profile with these settings. It's the arches that are different.

Regards
Mike
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 19269
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Post by hot66 »

1/2" higher at the front translate to a slight forward rake of the car. As Mike says, if you look at the side profile of a car you will see the front arch is slightly higher than the rear
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder

1963 Honda C100 Supercub

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 19269
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Post by hot66 »

210bhp wrote:Fman

Rear
Torsion bar centre 12mm (plus or minus 5mm) above rear wheel centre

Front
Torsion bar centre 108mm (plus or minus 5mm) below front wheel centre


With standard wheels and tyres with recommended pressures, car unladen.


Regards
Mike the stickman
I have just measured the front of mine using the 'proper' method ...

Front
Torsion bar centre 157mm (very very approx ) below front wheel centre :shock:

So my car is about 50 mm lower than recommended at the front :shock:
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder

1963 Honda C100 Supercub

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
210bhp
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 8251
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 210bhp »

Which is as near as dammit 2 inches so by the stick method you should be 23 and a half inches at the front but you said you were 24 and a quarter?? Are you sure you are not a tad lower than you think?



Regards
Mike
User avatar
Bootsy
Site admin and the Boss
Posts: 25750
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Post by Bootsy »

Never dis the stick!
1972 911T | 1994 993 Carrera | 1999 986 Boxster |

Vintage Heuer, Omega, Zenith and other vintage watches - http://www.heuerheritage.co.uk
Ian Donkin
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1306
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:07 pm
Location: A Southern Northerner

Post by Ian Donkin »

210bhp wrote: ...you should be 23 and a half inches at the front but you said you were 24 and a quarter?? Are you sure you are not a tad lower than you think?



Regards
Mike
:roll: It's like pulling teeth :roll:

:lol:
2006 RHD 997 Carrera (but DDK remains in my heart - also now no longer)
1972 LHD 2.4T with '73 2.4T CIS motor - gone to a new DDK home
1994 RHD 993 Carrera - gone!
1968 LHD 911L - was the Wife's but now in new hands :-(

#1252
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 19269
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Post by hot66 »

I'm 24 3/4 at the front & 24 ish at the back. ( measured at the same time)

The other measurements are :

wheel centre : 300mm

torsion bar centre : 143mm

difference = 157mm

BUT my measurements in this case are not that accurate as it was all done by eye.

BUT even in a worst case scenario of me being in accurate by 10 mm overall, its still quite low :shock:
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder

1963 Honda C100 Supercub

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
210bhp
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 8251
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 210bhp »

To be dead accurate you should really do this immediately after one of your spirited runs through the Dales. Have the garage door open your measuring and adjusting gear at the ready and one of your famous bags of fertilizer ready to pop into the drivers seat..............but then you are not going racing so I suppose this would be overkill.

Regards
Mike

oh and take the fuel gauge reading and keep your jack, tools and camping gear in the front.......we want it dead on for CLM
Gary71
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 10745
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 1:27 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Post by Gary71 »

Ian Donkin wrote:
210bhp wrote: ...you should be 23 and a half inches at the front but you said you were 24 and a quarter?? Are you sure you are not a tad lower than you think?

Regards
Mike
:roll: It's like pulling teeth :roll:

:lol:
I reckon he needs new glasses. Maybe he knows someone that could give him an eye test! :lol: :lol:
Post Reply