Page 1 of 1
Restored S for 24k?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:21 pm
by gridgway
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:10 pm
by stretch
20 - 25k under market value. Wonder why.?
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:56 pm
by hot66
except there wasn't a 2.4S in 1970
so basically it's a 1969 S shell chopped about bit to make it into an Impact bumper look a like + modified to take a 915 box & a 1973 2.4S engine.
It's a real bitza. Nice car in it's own right, but can't really be advertised as a 2.4S or even as a 1969 / 70 S. Considering this I think it should be valued slightly less than a decent Carrera RS rep ( the pre-73 look being more desirable) ?
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:01 pm
by davidppp
Its a US T...
But RHD..etc etc...
Kind regards
David
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:09 pm
by hot66
davidppp wrote:Its a US T...
But RHD..etc etc...
Kind regards
David
you sure David ? my info says 11930 .... is a 1969 S coupe
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:30 pm
by stretch

thought that might get the ball rolling.
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:46 pm
by IanMcLeod
That's not one of the UK RHD chassis numbers ...
Wonder where the chassis originated from?
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:49 pm
by 911ts3
Hot 66 wrote :- It's a real bitza. Nice car in it's own right, but can't really be advertised as a 2.4S or even as a 1969 / 70 S. Considering this I think it should be valued slightly less than a decent Carrera RS rep ( the pre-73 look being more desirable) ?
_________________
James
Agree wholeheartedly with James, nice car but the impact bumper front wings and bumper spoil it for me, plus the fact that its a mix & match of 2.4, 2.2, etc, and maybe a left to right conversion ?
Steve
911ts3
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:57 pm
by oldtimer
Without seeing the car in the flesh and giving it a run round the block , it appears to be in the right asking price bracket for an RS look a like with new bits and good paint.
The original '69S chassis has been minimised (!) and updating it/downgrading it to impact bumper look maybe goes against the market. Hopefully its an S gearbox with LSD as well as an S engine. The ad is silent on brakes and suspension upgrade so the car might be slower than it looks
FWIW , I did pay similar money almost 2 years ago for a 1969E coupe with rebuilt 1972 2.4S engine and box , and with lots of updated suspension and brake components.....a bitza under the skin ....but I guess not the same proposition as this car.

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:56 pm
by Bladesman
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:39 pm
by Rupsol
I went to have a look at this car at the weekend - needs a lot of work to finish. Has MFI issues, no real evidence of engine rebuild etc. Has been converted left to right and not very nicely. Came into the uK i the eighties from US and was then turbo bodied. I dont reckon its worth more the £15k most.