Am I missing the point?
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 1:43 am
I've put this in the Member's section as it's a topic I'd like advice on, but didn't want to discuss 'in public'. The majority of people who's advice I'm interested in hearing are all member's anyhow...
For those of you that don't know my car, an introduction:
I bought KDM 555K back in August '07 for very little money. Knowing relatively little about early 911s at this stage, other than good ones are rare and expensive, I expected the car to be complete grotbox. This was OK, as I had plans to cock-about with it in the engine and interior trim departments.
After a short while, I had some people-in-the-know (incl. Tuthills & Nick) take a look at it, and it transpired it was actually a pretty good car, un-restored and original. By this time I had changed a few bits and pieces, like fitting adjustable shock absorbers, and slamming it to the floor. So I raised it up a touch and had a think about things...
It's obvious the value (not necessarily monetary) of this base-spec T lies in the fact that it has lasted 35 years on this planet, with no meddling. So I stopped lusting after PMOs and a 3.2 block, and started looking after it a bit. Along the way it picked-up some other modifications, such as new mats and a Prototipo, but nothing that isn't reversible. I've hung on to all the original parts (even the non-oil-fed cam followers and cover plates - ?!)
My dilemma came last week. I'd been meaning to change the seat belts since they are as old as the car and probably useless in a crash. The other thing is that they are static belts and I really, really hate them. They get jammed in the door, are a bitch to adjust with different passengers, wrap around your leg and tackle you to the ground as you leave the car, and don't feel particularly safe unless they are straight-jacket tight. I just hate them.
I don't mind fitting new belts (I will probably even keep the original ones with all the other bits because I am a gimp). The idea of buying another static setup filled me with a deep sense of foreboding, so I looked at retractable belts, but they require drilling the rear arch trim panel to reach the mounting hole - a non-reversible modification.
I've spent so long thinking about this. The whole thing seems utterly trivial, but at the same time I love the car and want to enjoy it, but don't want to be the tit that ruins it's single special attribute. Or have I already done that?
Philosophical discussion welcome. I'm lost and don't know where I've going with this...
For those of you that don't know my car, an introduction:
I bought KDM 555K back in August '07 for very little money. Knowing relatively little about early 911s at this stage, other than good ones are rare and expensive, I expected the car to be complete grotbox. This was OK, as I had plans to cock-about with it in the engine and interior trim departments.
After a short while, I had some people-in-the-know (incl. Tuthills & Nick) take a look at it, and it transpired it was actually a pretty good car, un-restored and original. By this time I had changed a few bits and pieces, like fitting adjustable shock absorbers, and slamming it to the floor. So I raised it up a touch and had a think about things...
It's obvious the value (not necessarily monetary) of this base-spec T lies in the fact that it has lasted 35 years on this planet, with no meddling. So I stopped lusting after PMOs and a 3.2 block, and started looking after it a bit. Along the way it picked-up some other modifications, such as new mats and a Prototipo, but nothing that isn't reversible. I've hung on to all the original parts (even the non-oil-fed cam followers and cover plates - ?!)
My dilemma came last week. I'd been meaning to change the seat belts since they are as old as the car and probably useless in a crash. The other thing is that they are static belts and I really, really hate them. They get jammed in the door, are a bitch to adjust with different passengers, wrap around your leg and tackle you to the ground as you leave the car, and don't feel particularly safe unless they are straight-jacket tight. I just hate them.
I don't mind fitting new belts (I will probably even keep the original ones with all the other bits because I am a gimp). The idea of buying another static setup filled me with a deep sense of foreboding, so I looked at retractable belts, but they require drilling the rear arch trim panel to reach the mounting hole - a non-reversible modification.
I've spent so long thinking about this. The whole thing seems utterly trivial, but at the same time I love the car and want to enjoy it, but don't want to be the tit that ruins it's single special attribute. Or have I already done that?
Philosophical discussion welcome. I'm lost and don't know where I've going with this...