Page 1 of 1
Is it a 72T or 80's SC - help please
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:01 am
by davidc
I bought my 911 thinking that it was a 72 RHD T that was 'upgraded' to an SC long ago. It has the SC bumpers, wheels, rear arches,interior, brake servo, rear spoiler, engine ancilliaries, etc. It has some signs of a T as well e.g. the chrome. It was as cheap as chips.
I was told it had a 3.0 SC engine. I now find that the engine number matches the (72T) chassis number on the plate and chassis stamp. Good news I feel. However, at the same time I am finding more and more SC stuff e.g. fuel tank (and hence the chassis bits to accomodate it).
As a result I am wondering whether it could be an SC with a T chassis stamp and engine number grafted on rather than an updated T.
Can anybody tell me of any 'hard to change' signs to indicate the heritage of the engine and chassis other than the numbers?
Any advice gratefully received.
Dave
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:06 am
by Gary71
Hi,
If it's a '72 body then it will have the oil tank mounted in front of the RH rear wheel and an external filler flap on the RH rear quarter panel. This was only done on the '72 models and is the biggest clue to the shell heritage
Hope this helps
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:10 pm
by Nick Moss
There are dozens of differences between a 72 shell and an SC
The 72 has twin batteries mounted in boxes in each front inner wing, the SC has a single battery on the boot floor inside the left inner wing
The 72 has no dash vents, the SC has a centre vent and a small vent at each end above the knee roll
The SC has impact bumper mounts which are VERY solid
The SC has a brake servo
That should be enough to be getting on with.....
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:19 pm
by Glenn75S
SC will have Aluminium rear training arms, where 72 will be steel
72T will have narrow wheel arches (no flares) whereas the SC will have a a flare.
hope this helps
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:29 pm
by Barry
As Nick says, the S.C. has massive bumper mounts, coupled with a single battery. If you've just got lightweight bumpers with fabricated mounts, and a plated up or still-present offside battery box, it may well be an early shell. If the bumper mounts are very heavy (2-2.5mm) steel, well spot welded on to the underside of the rear chassis legs, and the outside of the front inner wings, it's probably an SC.
Don't forget: If it looks like a pig, oinks like a pig and smells like a pig ..... it probably is a pig

. Therefore if the only thing that makes it a '72 T is the engine and the chassis number (try feeling underneath the stamped-in number that should be to the off side of the flat bulkhead area
for welded in plates), then it's was probably an engineless S.C. with a donor engine.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:13 pm
by davidc
Thanks for your help guys.
A real mongrel this one. Despite V5, chassis/engine numbers and some early T bits it is, at heart, an SC I reckon.
Dave
