Page 32 of 38
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2025 9:35 am
by matteo68
It would have been much easier to go with a fibreglass rear bumper but you know me!…

Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2025 3:35 pm
by matteo68
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2025 4:45 pm
by matteo68
From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2025 10:30 pm
by matteo68
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2025 8:17 am
by KS
Just caught up on this. Helluva project!

From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2025 2:09 pm
by matteo68
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:51 pm
by rich73
Looking great Matt,
I really should have mounted the battery cut off there but put it under the bonnet. Might change that over the winter though.
Rich
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:54 pm
by matteo68
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 2:30 pm
by Leirbag
I can't wait to see this chassis rolling before Christmas! With all the parts preparation and the engine that you did beforehand, the reassembly won't be too complicated I imagine
matteo68 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 23, 2025 10:30 pm
One of the trademark features of the 1972 2.5 911 SR was the fact the diagonal bar went from above the passenger seat to behind the driver's seat, permitted by Appendix J regulations but different to its predecessor, the '70-'71 2.3 ST and also the 2.8 RSR in'73 - the latter seem below:
I don't quite agree with you Matteo about the 2.8L RSR, all the ones I know, apart from some prototypes, they all had what I call "the M491 roll cage" as I call it, or Sturzbügel (same as 2.5L S-R)
PS: is it 911 360 1155 ? or 911 360 0915?
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 2:37 pm
by matteo68
Oops! Happy to be corrected Leirbag! I certainly don't know everything about these cars, and RSR's even less so! I just saw this in Konradsheim's RS book and assumed they were all like that but perhaps not...
From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 2:46 pm
by matteo68
I do know that the some of the earlier 1970-71 STs had the diagonal going the other way - or at least the #45 911S of Bardini / Tourol did:

Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2025 3:11 pm
by matteo68
This is interesting too - in 1970-73 PET. Note the diagonal arrangement (and their drawings are usually pretty accurate depictions)...

Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 9:46 pm
by Leirbag
I don't really have the answer to why they changed the roll cage one way, then the other.
According to my data, the cars assembled at the factory:
Until 1970, the roll cage consisted of only a rim.
In 1971, a reinforcement was installed behind the driver.
In 1972 and 1973, the M491 roll cage with the reinforcement installed the other way (passenger side).
The photo you show me with #45 Bardini/Touroul is either the modified factory roll cage (119 30 0932 was a factory car in 1969), or a roll cage purchased from the factory in 1971/1972.
I can't find it back, but there's a somewhat well-known picture where you can see a 911 in the background, and the list of parts available for the competition kit. We can see the roll cage, which is a "driver" roll cage, different from the M491 roll cage.
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 9:49 pm
by matteo68
This one? Diagonal going the other way again - same as PET illustration...
Re: From ‘72T to 2.5 S-R: GeLo Racing #44
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:05 pm
by Darren65
Take your pick....
