Re: 70 S, RHD, Signal Orange, UK->Australia->UK
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 10:27 am
Nice sum up Barry 
The 'Maverick' Classic Porsche Forum and Classic Porsche Club for Porsche 356, Aircooled Porsche 911, Porsche 912, Porsche 914 & Porsche Replicas. 'We join for the cars but stay for the people'
https://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/
Indeed not.Barry wrote:So it's not all bad.
Barry wrote:yoda wrote:Well, it looks great! I am very much looking forward to seeing it in paint as I think it is hard to beat the aesthetic quality of a freshly restored, particularly in orange!
Sadly, I might never do my own as the costs seem to be only going one way. Great work thought and lovely to see that craftsmanship like that still exists.
Regards
Feroz
The rising costs are from panels, which have gone up hugely in last couple of years. My own labour rate (£40, no VAT) has been the same for last four years, and if it does go up, it won't be by much. I'm not sure if others have been ramping their prices, probably not recently. Those on a budget can do quite well by dealing with much of the stripping themselves, sometimes using the panels like a savings scheme well in advance, keeping an eye on Euro's deals and eBay / For sale ads etc.
Having said about panels, the flip side is that more and more repair parts are hitting the market, which makes it more viable to save the originals. Also, from my own point of view, I retain my collection of around 70 special tools / hammerforms and whatnot for making panels. Therefore much can be done to retain an otherwise good original area.
If you are lucky enough to have good outer panels, roof included, I would venture that the resto costs from me for example are the same as in 2013 (last price rise) inner panel price differences excepted. The positive against that is there's currently more choice on floors. sills, kidney bowls etc.
I think it's also important to compare apples to apples, and not to pears. Body restoration hours on their own don't tell the full story. Someone can easily trim the hours a bit if they've asked for a huge number of new panels from the customer. Obviously if there has been work involved in saving a £1500 panel, there's likely to be a labour cost there. Seen in isolation, this added labour might look a lot. But, assuming you've been able to save two front inner wings (what, £1550 each), and two rear innner wings (NLA, but were over £1000 each), perhaps a couple of A-posts (another £300 each), front scuttle ends (£1800 for new scuttle saved) and so on, the benefits really tot up. A pub conversation might just touch on the labour (How much?!?), and then forget to mention the £'000's in panel savings.
Anyway, just my t'pennies worth. You often hear the labour bit, but it's only when taken with panel costs can you really assess the fairness or otherwise of a specialist's bill.
For all that, yes, this is not a cheap interest at all, and it's a significant commitment to take on. I do maintain though, that by making sensible choices, heeding experienced advice, use as much DIY as you can and spreading the work out, you can still keep things relatively sensible. I always say that it's sometimes a good idea to split things into two groups on a resto. 1) Stuff you really, really don't want to be revisiting, or will cause damage not to be done straight away, so body, paint, cavity waxing, loom, oil lines / coolers, brake and pipe lines, safety items (steering / suspension / brakes) and so on. 2) Mechanicals that can be back out within half a day, interior (headlining aside), lights, possibly instruments and so on. This way you can split the work into two major phases. Phase one gets the car solid, save, dry, drivable and pretty smart and a cracking, long lasting foundation. Phase two can be done on a rolling resto basis as budget and time dicate. It's how I would do it anyway.
The DIY'ers have never had it so good either. All of these new repair panels move more cars towards realistic DIY propositions, for those with the time, skills and dedication to keep the project moving forward.
So it's not all bad.
One of the usual suspects. DC, near Barry.Dougieboy1 wrote:Richard, if you dont mind me asking, who is doing your painting?








I think it's been said before - it's horses for courses on restos. I don't think anyone should feel good or bad for whichever route they took - as long as it works for them.911hillclimber wrote:Indeed.
As a keen diy with cars I don't shy away from the body stuff and did mine in '88.
I think today my shell would be seen as really good except....
You can see all my repairs to the inner body. They are sound, never failed an MoT with them and the outer repairs can be found if you get close.
My NS wing is gas welded together using 3 wings. The guy about to paint it could not tell.
So, DIY but not invisible (in my skill-set) and that is something I have to put up with esp when today you see the likes of a 'Barry Shell'; the height of the jump is now very high.
Unless you are very good, DIY will be a big compromise, esp if the car is worth something.
In some ways mine is not which makes it easier to swallow the flaws. This car's purchase price and the subsequent metalwork has cost far more than my hot rod is worth!![]()
Long live those who can use specialists like Barry and the cars that materialise at the end.
Great that we see the background story.
Hi Richard,murph2309 wrote: Nobody needs to justify their own preference / choice / route. Respect does not come from the amount of money put into the project. Or the professionals or DIY'ers involved.
So lets enjoy each project on merit, celebrate the efforts that are being put in by all involved and not endlessly cross compare eh?