Page 2 of 4
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 4:56 pm
by 964RS
BILLY BEAN wrote:The total price paid for the vehicle is £151,200.00 which is comprised of the "hammer" price of £135,000 plus selling commission of £13,500 plus VAT of 20% on the commission which amounts to £2,700. So probably not the "bargain" it first appears.
Except that the figure includes the buyers commission and VAT so the total sale price was £135,000.
If the car was all correct it was a very good buy for someone

Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 3:17 pm
by left4dead
I think you'll find the price reflects that the car was re-shelled quite some time ago.
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:20 pm
by inaglasshouse
Is it a UK car?
Re-shelled from LHD to RHD?
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:37 pm
by left4dead
4th UK car, I believe (RHD).
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:40 pm
by inaglasshouse
Thanks.
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:20 pm
by veryporky
Re shelled and left to right hand drive, well that would account for the price, perhaps things are not quite so down beat after all!!
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:59 pm
by left4dead
veryporky wrote:...and left to right hand drive...
No, is a UK RHD car

.
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:52 am
by woznot
Is it Number matching ?
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:28 am
by Magnum
I'm curious I must admit....and not quite understanding this. Reliable, prolific posters having diametrically opposed opinions (based on their understanding of "different" facts presumably)?
Where has the "fact" that it has been re-shelled come from and what do the (presumably correct) numbers tell us?
Just wondering?
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:28 am
by Nick Moss
left4dead wrote:the car was re-shelled quite some time ago.
woznot wrote:Is it Number matching ?
By definition, no
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:07 am
by one-two
I don't mean to be pedantic, but typically the numbers do match when a car is reshelled - it's everything else that changes
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:39 am
by Nick Moss
So if I grind the numbers off one shell, add the numbers from a different shell (reshelling), it's still matching numbers? I'd be pretty p****d off if I found that had happened to my car.
2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:46 am
by hot66
Age old argument this ... not that I agree with reshells, but does it depend what actual shell was used ... genuine 73 or an SC .... have you just replaced a chassis number or used the doner shell as a source of panels
devils advocate where do you draw the line ..is it any difference to a car that’s had nearly all it metal replaced in a restoration , only original bit is the tunnel and part of the dash and maybe a few bits with the numbers stamped on
Look at Paul’s old ST that you did Nick..
I remember seeing many years ago a 901 being restored by possibly the best body shop in the uk ... that was technically a reshell ... all the 901 specific bodywork bits were being transferred over to a doner shell as original was too gone
Personally, I wouldn’t want a reshell where a chassis number is just swapped over to a decent shell
I’d have a full on restored body on a jig with handmade panels anytime
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 9:08 am
by one-two
Nick, it is matching numbers - that's why it's done. And I agree that, other things equal, it makes a car less desirable. However, we both know there are very few UK RHD cars that don't have significant amounts of non-original metal from somewhere or other.
Re: 2.4S at Brooklands
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 9:46 am
by 911hillclimber
If the buyer was fully aware of what has happened, when and how it was done (pro job or DIY) and paid what he was happy to pay then all is well?
Some are far more 'forgiving' of how things have been done than others. If it is all on the table then the buyer makes his mind up.
If things like reshell etc are hidden from the list of facts then that is another issue obviously.
The selling price seems to be far less than the market price for a perfect car (by today's standards) so I presume the history is declared and the price reflects this.
I too would prefer a restored shell to an SC shell with a 73 car's vin number (say) welded in.
A re-shell suggests a huge accident so brings into question all the car's components and their integrity; have they been replaced or bent back?