More scary cr@p from DVLA

Chat away, Classic Porsche related or otherwise

Moderators: hot66, Miggs, 58A - 71E, impmad2000, drummerboytom, Barry, Helen, Viv_Surby, Derek, KS, abm914, Mike Usiskin

Post Reply
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18002
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by Lightweight_911 »

.

Came across this statement (that I've not noticed before) yesterday when re-taxing my Fulvia online:


Image


I wonder if this also applies to the issuing of 'Q' plates - ie if the modifications were (& can be proved to be) carried out 30+ years ago then they are effectively ignored ?


.
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
Bruce M
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 1:07 pm

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by Bruce M »

I imagine it’s a small exemption for ex-police cars & similar, where they are modified when new?

For anything else, you’ll need proof including receipts from the workshop that did the work (diy good luck).
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 20702
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by 911hillclimber »

Isn't that an interesting message from the dvla.
Is the phrase modified actually defined anywhere in the public domain?

I would wager that diy can be a better job than some garages, and the converse too.
How is a garage more qualified back then than a competent diy person.
All imho very debatable.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
User avatar
KS
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 15771
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by KS »

Dated photographic evidence in the form of magazine features or similar has been accepted in the past, whether pro or diy.
Keith Seume
Follow on Instagram @orange914
My YouTube channel
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 20702
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by 911hillclimber »

That must be a rolling time frame?
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
gridgway
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5724
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by gridgway »

Just on a quick diversion, same topic. I assume that changing engine size on a V5 from 1600 to 1700 isn't going to invoke any daftness from DVLA?
Cortina
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1233
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:32 pm
Location: N.Ireland

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by Cortina »

gridgway wrote: Tue Jul 18, 2023 1:49 pm Just on a quick diversion, same topic. I assume that changing engine size on a V5 from 1600 to 1700 isn't going to invoke any daftness from DVLA?
Would expect not ..... part of me says ... why bother (leave it alone , let sleeping dogs lie) - so long as insurance company knows , why would you want to or need to ?(will it change anything ?)
Royal Enfield .. still in India
GL 1800 Tour DCT, for pleasure / Fantic 240 Professional - play
Rally 911 (1966) build parked for a while
Rally 928 (work started again - inc serious weight loss programe !)
.... and now another VW Up GTI owner.
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18002
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by Lightweight_911 »

.

Depends on whether you are talking about an increased capacity of the existing engine or a different engine to the one currently noted on the V5.

If the latter, I notified DVLA of a different/increased capacity engine in my Elite (1460cc FWB replacing the previous 1216cc FWE) & they wrote back saying that they required one of the following:

Image
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
Kneeslider
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by Kneeslider »

I'm currently having exactly this quandry. My 356 came from the USA with a dodgy re stamped 3rd piece.

It was a valid 356 engine number from 1963, and it appears on my V5 etc. When I did a complete engine rebuild 2 years ago, I replaced the 3rd piece with an un molested 3rd piece with a 1964 engine number, so much closer to the original engine number.

The problem with all this is, that I don't have any of the above documentation needed by the DVLA. The new 3rd piece was bought on Ebay, and the rest was bought piecemeal over 7 years.

I've kept the dodgy re stamped 3rd piece, and it will stay with the car if/when it is sold, and for now, the dodgy number is staying on the V5.

I've got a similar quandry with my Ducati. It has a complete, tuned 900ss engine with all the right bits, but no engine number at all, as I built it 20 years ago out of a pair of NOS un numbered crankcases, and anything I had lying around. Stamping new numbers on (or the number of the 750ss engine it replaced) would look odd.
'65 356 SC
'91 Ducati 750/900ss mongrel
1963 Velocette Viper (mostly) with '39 KSS OHC engine
'05 997 C2
1954 FB Mondial 200 Extra Lusso
User avatar
KS
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 15771
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by KS »

TBH my advice is unless you want to risk getting stung, don't poke a stick in a hornet's nest.
Keith Seume
Follow on Instagram @orange914
My YouTube channel
simon james
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 466
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 5:05 pm
Location: On t’ Moor Baht ‘at.

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by simon james »

Let’s be grateful that Porsche made sure the Chassis Number was properly stamped into the car itself.
Many BMC cars just had a screwed on aluminium plate reverse stamped with the cars identity.
If you have restored such a car and for whatever reason had to fit a new plate, the DVLA will not accept the car as original.
There’s a whole thread on the Mk1 Mini performance forum.
It doesn't matter if you speak your mind, because those that matter don't mind and those that mind don't matter.......!
STILL Lusting after a 30-98, “The Finest of Sporting Cars” so much it hurts!
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 19238
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by hot66 »

James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder

1963 Honda C100 Supercub

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 20702
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by 911hillclimber »

Read that too this morning.
Reads very encouraging and at last the dvla have listened carefully.
Just shows with determination a voice can be heard in these organisations of the Government.

I,m a member of the Accosiation, have been for years, great to see these changes.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
User avatar
KS
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 15771
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by KS »

Don't get too excited just yet. The only 'positive' here is that you get to keep the original VIN and reg number – there is no talk of retaining Historic status, and the whole IVA deal is not even mentioned. They encourage people to notify DVLA of mods, at which DVLA will be at liberty to say 'Yes you can keep the reg and VIN, but you'll need to go through IVA...' Cynical? Moi? No, just a realist.

Wait until the full paper is released on 29th before cracking open the Champagne...
Keith Seume
Follow on Instagram @orange914
My YouTube channel
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: More scary cr@p from DVLA

Post by BILLY BEAN »

With respect to engine change; I notified DVLA of a change of engine with the new engine number and a reduced capacity from 2.8 l to 2.7l and a colour change of the vehicle. A new V5 was issued with the changes but no queries. Lucky?
Last edited by BILLY BEAN on Wed Aug 20, 2025 5:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Rust Never Sleeps
Post Reply