The criterion fell around, purchase price driver involvement and running costs.
I voted for the Porsche 911 and you all know I own the beast.
The problem lies in the fact I have never driven an E36 M3 and he has never driven a 3.2 equipped light bodied 911. We are both swearing blind that our respective cars are the one, as it were.
The admin girl suggest we both try each others motors but that ain’t never gonna happen… we both fell about laughing.
Here’s the evidence:
84 3.2 Porsche 911 circa 13k for a semi decent one. 230bhp around 1300kg. It’s a weekend driver seats 2 comfortably. Very dynamic car, I should know it’s the most amazing car I have driven for what it gives back to the driver. However mine is somewhat lighter than a stockish 3.2 car.
VS
97 BMW M3 coupe Evo 3.2 circa 7-8k for semi decent one. 300bhp around 1400kg. Driven every day and seats 4. He says he tracked it and drives the nuts off it and its simply amazing. Also comes with the ability to be used every day, aircon and all that.
I must say he has a point. I have driven a few sport beemers and they have been great cars. Not on par with a 911 tho... but I have never driven the M variety.
Any opinions? Are they really that good?

