Darren65 wrote:Anything to share Bro?….
Me ?
Nope, I only make things look pretty...haven't got a clue how it works
Moderator: Bootsy
Darren65 wrote:Anything to share Bro?….
Since when do I talk technical!....I ducked out of the strut brace debate as soon as Andy had put me in my place!jury wrote:Darren65 wrote:Anything to share Bro?….
Me ?
Nope, I only make things look pretty...haven't got a clue how it works
Thinking of taking the Ferrari are you?haasad wrote:Hey Darren you'll learn how techy I really am when you see me ring for a euro recovery truck.....1/2 way to le mans ...




sladey wrote:Did you wet it first chris? Meant to make it easier
dragonfly wrote:Great work as always Chris, this project is great inspiration.
However, I'm confused by the suggestion of a strut brace needing to resist torsional loads, as this would suggest the brace mounts can rotate relative to each other around the axis of the brace itself. The only way I can see this occurring is if the shock towers could rotate forwards and backwards, pivoting from somewhere low down, and the inner wings resist this.
What am I missing...?

Chris, just grin & nod when someone tries the explain that one in the pub car park.jury wrote: Thanks mate![]()
I have laid my cards on the table when it comes to the Physics side of things, I have learn't to take a back seat and just listen![]()
It is my guess that under heavy side ways load, mid-corner, the Towers would not move relative to each other...I think the force would be relative to the wheel ( at a right angle ), and this offset would create a rotational load....
As I say I THINK, so don't hold me to that explanation![]()
Chris
Bruce M wrote: Chris, just grin & nod when someone tries the explain that one in the pub car park.
sladey wrote:So you're going with no heat Chris? With snow outside?