1969T tastefully modified

The place to post image of your PORSCHES

Moderator: Bootsy

gridgway
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5715
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by gridgway »

We think it's all 2.4S graham, it could well be a bit peaky, I'm looking forward to trying it out!
gridgway
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5715
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by gridgway »

Today's topic...brakes. I had been very unhappy with the brakes. Very wooden and no bite. Quite a good pedal, but not rock solid if that makes sense. Fronts are S spec calipers (so L&M calipers).

To try and make a difference, I changed the front pads for some greenstuff ones (some people love em, some hate em). It definitely made a difference to almost acceptable. I got them bedded in and working, so that was good.

Then last weekend I saw Will Chappell selling some used pagid blue pads which are expensive new to try on a whim, but used, worth trying. They arrived all as described. No taper or anything worrying going on. So I popped them in yesterday and went for a blat.

Result, fabulous, they work very well indeed, considerably better bite and ability to lock the wheels. The pedal feel is the same, a bit so so. I'll do a bleed of the brakes, but I doubt it'll make any difference as they don't feel soft like there is air.

Then I might investigate whether there is a bigger m/c to try. I know that only changes the feel not the effectiveness, but that's what I'd like really a firmer pedal now the stopping power is there.
Derek
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1179
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 2:10 pm
Location: Shropshire

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by Derek »

My preference after pads and fluid changes is to replace the rubber flexi pipes with Goodridge stainless or similar to give me the pedal feel, I prefer. I’ve been doing it on bikes and cars for years and it's consistent and it works for me.
No idea if it’s the feel you are looking, sorry.
1970 911 3.6T
gridgway
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5715
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by gridgway »

Interesting idea Derek. Will look into that.
Graham
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 16794
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by Lightweight_911 »

..
S alloy calipers suffer from 'flexing' which can affect brake efficiency.

A worthwhile upgrade is to swap the brakes for 3.2 Carrera discs & calipers ...

.
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18857
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by 911hillclimber »

A callipers up front on 3.5" struts, M callipers on rear.
Drilled stock size 2.4 discs, and the secret ingredient, French Carbone pads all round.
Stock master, Aeroquip flex lines, dot 4 fluid.

Bit noises, but will STOP you.
Ask Darren 65 too.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
Nine One One
Put a fork in me, I'm done!
Posts: 1619
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:45 am
Location: Kernow - good old Cornwall

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by Nine One One »

Then I might investigate whether there is a bigger m/c to try. I know that only changes the feel not the effectiveness, but that's what I'd like really a firmer pedal now the stopping power is there.
[/quote]

I tried a larger master cylinder on mine, after being told it would improve the feel of the pedal. I did not, it made it feel rock solid with no feel whatsoever, and you had to push like mad to get anything to work.
It was brand new, stayed on for that one drive and removed, and the correct diameter found from Europe, you are welcome to try it, but stick to the original diameter for standard set up to be honest
User avatar
yoda
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3133
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:01 am
Location: London

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by yoda »

Lightweight_911 wrote:..
S alloy calipers suffer from 'flexing' which can affect brake efficiency.

A worthwhile upgrade is to swap the brakes for 3.2 Carrera discs & calipers ...

.
I swapped my S callipers to 3.2 Carrera discs / callipers and it was a great improvement. Definitely worth doing if your not happy with the current set up.
The force is strong in this one ......
map
DDK Fanatic
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:56 pm

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by map »

911hillclimber wrote:....and the secret ingredient, French Carbone pads all round.
Stock master, Aeroquip flex lines, dot 4 fluid.
Do you mean Carbone Lorraine?

If so more info here:

https://www.cl-brakes.co.uk/pad-compoun ... ained.html

Also use these (RC5+ compound) on my heavily tweaked 3.7 litre 986 Boxster (road trip/track car) and they're definitely the "secret ingredient" along with the other tweaks 911hillclimber describes. They replaced the Pagid Blue/front and OE/rear which worked well in this application - RC5+ front and rear very clearly upgraded the braking performance. A full set will go onto the 3.6SC as part of its recommissioning later this year.
gridgway
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5715
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by gridgway »

yoda wrote:
Lightweight_911 wrote:..
S alloy calipers suffer from 'flexing' which can affect brake efficiency.

A worthwhile upgrade is to swap the brakes for 3.2 Carrera discs & calipers ...

.
I swapped my S callipers to 3.2 Carrera discs / callipers and it was a great improvement. Definitely worth doing if your not happy with the current set up.
Looks like a common theme. I assume this is just on the front?
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 18221
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by hot66 »

yoda wrote:
Lightweight_911 wrote:..
S alloy calipers suffer from 'flexing' which can affect brake efficiency.

A worthwhile upgrade is to swap the brakes for 3.2 Carrera discs & calipers ...

.
I swapped my S callipers to 3.2 Carrera discs / callipers and it was a great improvement. Definitely worth doing if your not happy with the current set up.
I did the same on my S too . Its not night & day, but I could feel the flex with the S calipers
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
jwhillracer
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2618
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:58 pm
Location: Sunny Somerset, just above the water....

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by jwhillracer »

I have never had anything but S callipers on either our Hillclimb 911 or our 914/6, and have never found them wanting, or particularly noticed any flex.
The difference after installing CL pads on both of them was night and day though. The first few Hillclimb meetings after fitting the CL pads, I found I was braking far too early, they were so much more effective.

They are noisy though, when pottering around the lanes ……….

JW
Life's a single timed run with no practice....
1970 914/6 2.4E/Webers
1970 VW Beetle project
1972 911 Hillclimber 3.2 MFI. Part of the family for 30+ years!
2006 Hymer Merc Starline 630
2000 T4 Van LPG
2000 Golf V5 Estate GT (Greyhound Transport!)
User avatar
yoda
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3133
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:01 am
Location: London

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by yoda »

gridgway wrote:
yoda wrote:
Lightweight_911 wrote:..
S alloy calipers suffer from 'flexing' which can affect brake efficiency.

A worthwhile upgrade is to swap the brakes for 3.2 Carrera discs & calipers ...

.
I swapped my S callipers to 3.2 Carrera discs / callipers and it was a great improvement. Definitely worth doing if your not happy with the current set up.
Looks like a common theme. I assume this is just on the front?
Yes, just the fronts on mine.
The force is strong in this one ......
gridgway
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5715
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by gridgway »

Thanks Feroz.

And for those CL users, which if the pad compounds are you using?
smallspeed
I used to have a life, then came DDK
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:38 pm
Location: leicester
Contact:

Re: 1969T tastefully modified

Post by smallspeed »

Use RC5+
The old RC5's were very noisy, the +'s seem to have fixed most of that and a few other issues (I think they've got better bite from cold, etc)
I use RC6 in my track car and they're astounding when warm, but a bit too wooden and noisy on the road so I'd say if this is a fast road car then don't go with them

Beautiful car by the way graham - pretty much the dream colour combo!
Post Reply