DVLA nonsense

Chat away, Classic Porsche related or otherwise

Moderators: hot66, Miggs, 58A - 71E, impmad2000, drummerboytom, Barry, Helen, Viv_Surby, Derek, KS, abm914, Mike Usiskin

stretch
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2697
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 2:54 pm
Location: Kent

DVLA nonsense

Post by stretch »

Has anyone recently had an application for an age related plate refused by the DVLA . ?
I have recently been refused an age related plate for my 70 car despite supplying a Certificate of authenticity / proof or age from Porsche.

Is this a recent policy as i am sure there are plenty on here that have obtained Age related plates after supplying age evidence.
They say the car was registered in the UK in 81 and that it has the correct plate. :evil:

A slight contradiction as they say you can't make a car look younger than it is with a number plate.... Twat's. :lol:

Dave
70T barn find...... to ST.
1998 C2 996 Kettle
User avatar
yoda
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3146
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:01 am
Location: London

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by yoda »

Have you tried correcting the V5 if that says 81? Was pretty straightforward when I did it last.
The force is strong in this one ......
stretch
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2697
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 2:54 pm
Location: Kent

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by stretch »

Can you elaborate as i intend to appeal, hence the post. ? I have sent the COA and a covering letter as i want an age related plate but they have refused.

The car was imported in 81 from Germany and i assume it was assigned the plate as the the owner could not prove it's age at the time.
70T barn find...... to ST.
1998 C2 996 Kettle
User avatar
yoda
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3146
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:01 am
Location: London

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by yoda »

Send the CoA to the DVLA and get the year of manufacturer corrected first. Then apply for an age related plate.
The force is strong in this one ......
MarkIII
I luv DDK!
Posts: 987
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:16 pm

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by MarkIII »

Hi Dave

I recently went through the same process and acquired the original reg for my 67 car. DVLA were very helpful. I provided all the relevant info such as orginal registration doc's clearly showing the original registration, photo's of the car showing the original registration number etc however they needed proof of ownership and various other bits of information one of which was a covering letter from the relevant owners club. I contacted Steve Kelvin At PGB and provided the following info:

A completed V765 and V55/5 forms
Copy of my V5C
Photographic evidence of vin plate on front cross member
Photograph of the vin number stamped in the luggage compartment
Photographs of the car from back in 67 displaying the original reg number

Steve was really helpful and provided a copy of the original sales ledger and a covering letter stating that the car was first registered with the said registration. I then provided all of this info back to dvla and within a couple of weeks I had my new V5

Cheers
Mark
stretch
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2697
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 2:54 pm
Location: Kent

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by stretch »

Thanks chaps. This is exactly my gripe. I have spoken with the DVLA, they instructed me to apply with a covering letter and proof of age and assured me it was a standard procedure. But now they still refuse to change the x prefix to the 1970 H plate.

Mark, i think your's is a slightly different case as your car had a previous UK registration.

My reply from the DVLA:

" i have looked into your request again concerning the registration mark, however after requesting advice on this, the original response still stands. The vehicle was registered before 1983, age related numbers are not appropriate as these vehicles have been correctly registered in line with the policy/ procedures at that time."

What a PITA. I can buy a H plate for around £50 but i feel an appeal coming on.
70T barn find...... to ST.
1998 C2 996 Kettle
User avatar
yoda
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3146
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:01 am
Location: London

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by yoda »

£50 is ok ...... not worth the hassle.
The force is strong in this one ......
andytat
DDK forever
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:26 pm
Location: Worcestershire

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by andytat »

I was advised that a letter of origin ( LOO, available from PCGB) is what you need
as proof of date of manufacture.
I hope that helps.
But it costs £65.00!

Andy
Now Porsche less and sad.
3.2 Carrera Speedster (Sold and sorely missed)
3.2 Manual Cayenne (Sold)
73 2.4S (Gone to Singapore)
75 3.0l 914 (Sold)
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 16928
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by Lightweight_911 »

yoda wrote:£50 is ok ...... not worth the hassle.
- plus another £80 for the transfer...
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
stretch
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2697
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 2:54 pm
Location: Kent

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by stretch »

I think i can lay my hands on £50 quid...! Reason for the post was to have a rant and to appeal as a matter of principle if they have set a precedent with other DDK folk.

No hassle for me as i have my own personal rant assistant who manages all my rant admin. :lol:
70T barn find...... to ST.
1998 C2 996 Kettle
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 19025
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by 911hillclimber »

My 911t came to this country in Y registration, as in YRRxxxY
Several time in the last 28 years I have owned it I have tried to get an age related number, but always refused as " it has the correct number because you car can only have the number as date of import.
I did not import it which I think makes matters worse.
Presumably if a I buy a 1973 number from the dvla then all is ok.

Pay pay pay, you know the drill.
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
Nick Moss
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 9424
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:59 pm
Location: East Sussex
Contact:

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by Nick Moss »

Dave, does the car have historic status?
Nick Moss - early911.co.uk - Fuchs refurbishment
07980 017994
nick@early911.co.uk
stretch
Me and DDK sitting in a tree! KISSING
Posts: 2697
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 2:54 pm
Location: Kent

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by stretch »

It's last tax disc is dated 1981 Nick. I assume i can only apply for historic status/ free tax if i have a current MOT.
Maybe that would makes a difference.?
70T barn find...... to ST.
1998 C2 996 Kettle
stuby
Put a fork in me, I'm done!
Posts: 1660
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Derbyshire - Gods chosen county....

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by stuby »

stretch wrote:It's last tax disc is dated 1981 Nick. I assume i can only apply for historic status/ free tax if i have a current MOT.
Maybe that would makes a difference.?
When I got mine, it's a 68 car, registered in uk in 79 and had a T reg on it. I had to mot it with the 79 plate on it, then apply for a 68 plate even though it stated year of manufacture 68 on the v5

I backed it up with the coa from Porsche, no problem

Stu
Don't shoot the messenger....He's only doing his job!
sladey
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 8817
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: DVLA nonsense

Post by sladey »

Isn't the issue that they are hanging this on the fact that it was first registered in the UK in 81? The other ones above appear to have been registered in the UK from new.
The simple things you see are all complicated
I look pretty young but I'm just backdated yeah
Post Reply