Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 4:07 pm
Vic - it's John AldingtonSlope330 wrote:When Faure had hair and was a professional cartoonist ..........who s the tall one Mike ?
Not John Farren ?
DDK - Die Deutschen Klassiker
The 'Maverick' Classic Porsche Forum and Classic Porsche Club for Porsche 356, Aircooled Porsche 911, Porsche 912, Porsche 914 & Porsche Replicas. 'We join for the cars but stay for the people'
https://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/
This won't be cheap
Page 2 of 3
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 6:48 pm
RGO 2L
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 6:49 pm
RGO 3L
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 6:52 pm
RGO 4L
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 6:55 pm
thks Andy , know who he was but never ever met
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 7:28 pm
RGO 6L. A stunning black 2.4s.
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 7:29 pm
Does anyone know of RGO 5L?
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 7:42 pm
According to DVLA, RGO 5L was on a Silver 2.4 - doesn't say whether it was a T, E or S model - not been taxed since 1991 ...
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 8:02 pm
RVO2L
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 11:40 am
Some cars age better than others!leche wrote:RGO 3L
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:47 pm
I understand that RGO 5L is on a 911E, that may be stored in a container near Dover.
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 3:32 pm
is that where ur dossing then Nick ?
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 4:18 pm
Lightweight_911 wrote:According to DVLA, RGO 5L was on a Silver 2.4 - doesn't say whether it was a T, E or S model - not been taxed since 1991 ...
Nick is right. RGO 5L was a 2.4E in Silver.Nick Moss wrote:I understand that RGO 5L is on a 911E, that may be stored in a container near Dover.
It is my understanding that the registrations were originally assigned as
RGO 4L 2.4 T Sportomatic in Tangerine registered 22/3/1973
RGO 5L 2.4 E in Silver registered 29/3/1973
RGO 6L 2.4 S in Black registered 29/3/1973
RGO 2L and RGO 3L were both 2.7 RS in White with Red registered in the same period.
Ian.
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 3:27 pm
I owned that 2.4 'T' for many years - although the reg had, by then, been switched to an RSL that may have had a shell swap.IanMcLeod wrote: It is my understanding that the registrations were originally assigned as
RGO 4L 2.4 T Sportomatic in Tangerine registered 22/3/1973
RGO 5L 2.4 E in Silver registered 29/3/1973
RGO 6L 2.4 S in Black registered 29/3/1973
RGO 2L and RGO 3L were both 2.7 RS in White with Red registered in the same period.
Ian.
I sold the 2.4 'T' to Mike Bradley (Cathay Pacific pilot) who had it converted to RS 'race' spec by Adrian Yates-Smith, and it was shipped out to Hong Kong for racing in the Far East.
I'd be interested to know a bit more about RGO 5L if someone can PM me. Thanks
Re: This won't be cheap
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 7:20 pm
while M471 lightweight s are £1mio ,if ur lucky!
M472 can be found in Europe for £300k in average quality ........top cars are trading over £400k
not coming down in near future....... promise !
M472 can be found in Europe for £300k in average quality ........top cars are trading over £400k
not coming down in near future....... promise !