1972 ST Clone

The place to post image of your PORSCHES

Moderator: Bootsy

911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18857
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by 911hillclimber »

What an interesting catch-up.
When I installed the dreaded Clewett twin plug system on the Lola's 3.2 many told me the leads had to be spaced apart everywhere.
This proved impossible, but i tried very hard to keep the lead off the engine.
I used another supplier that Magnacore. They were very hard work, so moved to another UK specialist at a fraction of the cost.

Still, you are all done now.
I hear very good reports of Mike Champion, I think he is a continuation of Bob Watson.
Always been reluctant to go to CG due to the cost, but never read a bad thing about them.

Image
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2103
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by BILLY BEAN »

911hillclimber wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:46 am What an interesting catch-up.
When I installed the dreaded Clewett twin plug system on the Lola's 3.2 many told me the leads had to be spaced apart everywhere.
This proved impossible, but i tried very hard to keep the lead off the engine.
I used another supplier that Magnacore. They were very hard work, so moved to another UK specialist at a fraction of the cost.

Still, you are all done now.
I hear very good reports of Mike Champion, I think he is a continuation of Bob Watson.
Always been reluctant to go to CG due to the cost, but never read a bad thing about them.

Image
Thanks for the contribution Graham. Agree that spacing the plug leads on a twin plug is impossible hence adopting larger diameter leads with more 'sheathing' around them. Mike did make some changes with respect to the loops and captives to guide the leads but essentially no change to the original routing.
As for CG they charge a fixed cost plus any consumables. Yes more expensive than you would normally expect but you are paying for the expertise.
Rust Never Sleeps
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 18221
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by hot66 »

All my clewett leads are clumped together and have been for the past 10 years or so. Saying that, clewett do recommend replacing all leads every 3 years , which I have still yet to do !
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2103
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by BILLY BEAN »

hot66 wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:26 pm All my clewett leads are clumped together and have been for the past 10 years or so. Saying that, clewett do recommend replacing all leads every 3 years , which I have still yet to do !
James, is your engine twin plug? According to MCE that is where potential issues occur rather than on single plug set ups. I also run Classic Retrofit spark boxes which may or may not make a contribution to the cross talk with its generous spark. For clarity the issue was only on the right hand cylinders where the plug leads are both longer and lack separation as they travel over the fan housing and through guide loops.
Rust Never Sleeps
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 18221
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

1972 ST Clone

Post by hot66 »

Yep, twin plug for years now and no apparent problems. It’s more the lower cables bundled into 3 on each side as they pass through the twin ware / seal .

My coil packs are mounted above the flywheel and cables fed from there
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2103
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by BILLY BEAN »

hot66 wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 1:39 pm Yep, twin plug for years now and no apparent problems. It’s more the lower cables bundled into 3 on each side as they pass through the twin ware / seal .

My coil packs are mounted above the flywheel and cables fed from there
Different routing to mine as I have the distributor
obviously where all the leads come from with six cables running over the fan housing crammed together. Your set up may be better at avoiding cross talk. You have a different manufacturer for the leads and possibly they are better insulated than the Magnacor offering?
Rust Never Sleeps
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18857
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by 911hillclimber »

No cross sparking on mine despite all this spaghetti.
You simply cannot separate all the cables.

My cables are 8mm, and there are over 40 separaters on the engine...

Image
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2103
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by BILLY BEAN »

911hillclimber wrote: Wed Jan 25, 2023 4:19 pm No cross sparking on mine despite all this spaghetti.
You simply cannot separate all the cables.

My cables are 8mm, and there are over 40 separaters on the engine...

Image
Graham,
I originally had 7mm ignition leads and have now moved to 8.5mm. Agree it is impossible to have complete separation of ignition leads but MCE got the issue sorted with a larger diameter leads and some revision to the cable runs.
Rust Never Sleeps
User avatar
MikeyC
Married to the DDK
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:08 am
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by MikeyC »

Firstly, thanks for the excellent summary of the recent works, Kirk, and glad to have been able to help out.

Regards the differences in sensitivity to 'spark jumping' when comparing these different types of ignition set-up, and to provide some additional context to Graham and James' experiences: I believe the Clewett system is a wasted spark system, therefore already firing plugs on the exhaust stroke as well as at compression. Depending on where in the firing sequence the potential for cross-talk occurs, this can render the issue of spark jumping from cylinder to cylinder non-problematic, as it's already giving additional unnecessary sparks 'by design', and if the leads allow it, may be able to afford to literally waste (or more accurately, inadvertently supplement) spark energy where a conventional distributed system can't. Double this up to twin-plug, wasted spark, and there is plenty of spare spark to go around.

Also worth noting that whereas a single-plug distributed system on a 6-cyl engine has no spare sparks to give away, a twin-plug system (distributor or wasted-spark) can afford some redundancy in the low-load/low-speed region, and I've seen a few (mainly road duty) twin-plug engines with failed plugs or faulty plug leads that have gone completely undetected, with one plug doing all the work in the cylinder. The shortfall only being discovered when going through ignition optimisation for peak power or, as in Kirk's case, hunting down insufficient part-load fuel burn issues.

Possibly even more relevant is that looking at Graham's pics and judging by those coil packs, it appears that Clewett uses an inductive system to generate spark energy, not capacitive discharge (CDi). Inductive systems tend to run at slightly lower HT voltages, so unless you've got an enormous spark plug electrode gap trying to be bridged, there's less energy being carried, so less propensity to try and 'take an alternative route', therefore less sensitivity to HT sheathing thickness.

Hope this helps put some detail behind the difference in the systems and the ways in which they get the spark to the plug, and I should emphasise that we're musing over potential failure modes here, not the system 'normal' healthy state. In most cases, leads are doing their job, and their insulation is working as intended, so regardless of which hardware is in play, spark goes nowhere but to the intended cylinders, and the potential failure modes described above are rare occurrences.

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk

Mike Champion
www.mceporsche.com
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 18221
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by hot66 »

Thanks for the explanation on the systems … electrics are not really thing.

You,are right, clewett does have a wasted spark as 6 coil packs running the 12 plugs
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
User avatar
Jonny Hart
Put a fork in me, I'm done!
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:28 pm

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by Jonny Hart »

A basic layman's test is to look at your engine running in the dark - can be quite illuminating! The area around number 1 cylinder can be quite prone to stray sparks.
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 18857
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: 1972 ST Clone

Post by 911hillclimber »

Sorry if this reads 'off-topic' but I had exhaustive emails with Clewett during my issues with the system they sold me a year ago.
During all the words Clewett demanded that the location of the parts and the lead routes and separation were focused on and this led me to re-locate all manner of components from my original locations that got the heavy parts mid ships on this car.

He expressed that such miss-locations were responsible for failure of the control unit which was the root of the problems...

But all is well now. These systems are not the easiest to fault find when you really do not like electrics!
Responses like Mike's above sure help.

Have to say now sorted my 3.2 is a belter!
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
Post Reply