1968 911S mix too rich at 9.3?
Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Barry, Viv_Surby, Derek, Mike Usiskin
1968 911S mix too rich at 9.3?
Had my 1968 S dyno’d today, power was 152.5 torque 127; fuel mix was 9.3 .
Tester suggested mix was too rich, is he right? What adjustments can I make? It’s a stock 911S with K&N filters (in case that matters). Running Esso super which I understand is 0% ethanol 99 octane
It was warm today, so don’t know how much difference that would make vs the ‘book’ power of 160
Thanks Rich
Tester suggested mix was too rich, is he right? What adjustments can I make? It’s a stock 911S with K&N filters (in case that matters). Running Esso super which I understand is 0% ethanol 99 octane
It was warm today, so don’t know how much difference that would make vs the ‘book’ power of 160
Thanks Rich
Re: 1968 911S mix too rich at 9.3?
9.3:1 afr?
If so, far too rich. Even MFI motors aren’t running at that level. I can only speak for an MFI system, but for mfi we aim to be late 12’s maybe early 13’s at WOT full load high revs
If so, far too rich. Even MFI motors aren’t running at that level. I can only speak for an MFI system, but for mfi we aim to be late 12’s maybe early 13’s at WOT full load high revs
James
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
-
- DDK forever
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:13 pm
- Location: Essex
Re: 1968 911S mix too rich at 9.3?
Far too rich, agree with James.
Dont be tempted by the pub numbers, engines make what they make, the key in setup is driveability and smoothness. I have done a good few where we could get more horsepower at the top but leaving the mid range a nasty place to be.
The engine will tell you when it is happy, seat of the pants dyno is a good confirmation of where the setup sits.
Dont be tempted by the pub numbers, engines make what they make, the key in setup is driveability and smoothness. I have done a good few where we could get more horsepower at the top but leaving the mid range a nasty place to be.
The engine will tell you when it is happy, seat of the pants dyno is a good confirmation of where the setup sits.
Simon
1970 911T (with E motor)
1978 Moto Guzzi 850T3
daily whatever parts chaser.
1970 911T (with E motor)
1978 Moto Guzzi 850T3
daily whatever parts chaser.
-
- Nurse, I think I need some assistance
- Posts: 16925
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
- Location: Worcs/W Mids border
Re: 1968 911S mix too rich at 9.3?
.
If they are a competent outfit familiar with 'old' (ie carb-equipped) engines, why didn't you get them to make the necessary adjustments while on the dyno ?
.
If they are a competent outfit familiar with 'old' (ie carb-equipped) engines, why didn't you get them to make the necessary adjustments while on the dyno ?
.
Andy
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
Re: 1968 911S mix too rich at 9.3?
Unfortunately they were not interested in adjusting the carbs.
If I wanted to lean up the 1000-4000 is this an adjustment I can make on the carbs? Without re-jetting ?
If I wanted to lean up the 1000-4000 is this an adjustment I can make on the carbs? Without re-jetting ?
Re: 1968 911S mix too rich at 9.3?
thats not quite as bad as you first made out ... at WOT near the red line your afr isnt too bad
James
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast
1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder
1973 MGB Roadster
Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast