Tapatalk

Chat away, Classic Porsche related or otherwise

Moderators: hot66, Miggs, 58A - 71E, impmad2000, drummerboytom, Barry, Helen, Viv_Surby, Derek, KS, abm914, Mike Usiskin

Post Reply
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Tapatalk

Post by BILLY BEAN »

Made two posts recently with Tapatalk. In the first post the picture appeared on DDK rotated 180 degrees (ie upside down). The second post today resulted in the picture appearing rotated 90 degrees. Any one know why the picture orientation is changing?
Thanks.
Rust Never Sleeps
User avatar
Bootsy
Site admin and the Boss
Posts: 23960
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Bootsy »

BILLY BEAN wrote:Made two posts recently with Tapatalk. In the first post the picture appeared on DDK rotated 180 degrees (ie upside down). The second post today resulted in the picture appearing rotated 90 degrees. Any one know why the picture orientation is changing?
Thanks.

I don't I'm afraid - never experienced that

The orientation on your phone is correct?
1972 911T | 1994 993 Carrera | 1999 986 Boxster | 1990 T25 Camper

Vintage Heuer, Omega, Zenith and other vintage watches - http://www.heuerheritage.co.uk
User avatar
KS
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 14962
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Cornwall

Re: Tapatalk

Post by KS »

Bootsy wrote:

I don't I'm afraid - never experienced that

The orientation on your phone is correct?
More worried about your orientation, reading some of your posts... :love6:
Keith Seume
Follow on Instagram @orange914
My YouTube channel
rhd racer
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: Tapatalk

Post by rhd racer »

I just posted a pic from my phone using Tapatalk and it was fine - not had that happen before
93 964 C2
99 Boxster 2.5 > 2.7 hill climber

71 914/6 3.0 - gone

'You see Paul, hill climbing is like making love to a beautiful woman. You get your motor running, check your fluids, hang on tight and WHOA..30 seconds later it's all over!' Swiss Tony
User avatar
Bootsy
Site admin and the Boss
Posts: 23960
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Bootsy »

KS wrote:
Bootsy wrote:

I don't I'm afraid - never experienced that

The orientation on your phone is correct?
More worried about your orientation, reading some of your posts... :love6:
You should know honey
1972 911T | 1994 993 Carrera | 1999 986 Boxster | 1990 T25 Camper

Vintage Heuer, Omega, Zenith and other vintage watches - http://www.heuerheritage.co.uk
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Tapatalk

Post by BILLY BEAN »

Bootsy wrote:
BILLY BEAN wrote:Made two posts recently with Tapatalk. In the first post the picture appeared on DDK rotated 180 degrees (ie upside down). The second post today resulted in the picture appearing rotated 90 degrees. Any one know why the picture orientation is changing?
Thanks.

I don't I'm afraid - never experienced that

The orientation on your phone is correct?
Orientation of the phone is consistent but the end result is not.
Rust Never Sleeps
User avatar
Bootsy
Site admin and the Boss
Posts: 23960
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Re: Tapatalk

Post by Bootsy »

Very strange

I’ll see if I can find any reference to it
1972 911T | 1994 993 Carrera | 1999 986 Boxster | 1990 T25 Camper

Vintage Heuer, Omega, Zenith and other vintage watches - http://www.heuerheritage.co.uk
shambly
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 484
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 1:03 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Tapatalk

Post by shambly »

Probably down to not all software interpreting the exif orientation data embedded within a jpeg image taken by a digital camera. Some will show it as natively arranged in the file and some will rearrange the native orientation based on what the exif data says about how the camera was oriented when taken....
BILLY BEAN
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2111
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:42 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Tapatalk

Post by BILLY BEAN »

shambly wrote:Probably down to not all software interpreting the exif orientation data embedded within a jpeg image taken by a digital camera. Some will show it as natively arranged in the file and some will rearrange the native orientation based on what the exif data says about how the camera was oriented when taken....
Thanks for the reply. That would possible explain the situation. However, photo taken with same camera orientation but got two different end results one at 90 degrees and one at 180 degrees. Previous posts to the above have been without issue.
Rust Never Sleeps
Post Reply