3.0 conversion first impressions...

For classic Porsche 911 content

Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Barry, Viv_Surby, Derek, Mike Usiskin

Gilbert '71 T
I luv DDK!
Posts: 894
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 9:12 am
Location: N London

3.0 conversion first impressions...

Post by Gilbert '71 T »

WOW GUYS…..I had my first day’s driving my 911 since the 3.0 engine went in today, I have been so excited over it I just had to share it with you, as I know you’d understand.

The engine was from a 77 3.0 Carrera, books state 200hp as standard which is enough in an early car I think, I used my old 2.2 exhaust system on the engine, which I’m not sure has increased hp, but it sure does sound the part, quite deep at the low end and really really raspy at the upper end. I also used the 901/911 gearbox, so I might be loosing some hp to wheels through that, but hey I’m not complaining, the gearing is so short in the 70/71 901 that it makes it a really fun car to drive.

Also used the 3.0 K-Jet (CIS) which I’m lead to believe is set up for better throttle response than other 911 K-Jet systems, first impressions are it’s not as instant as carbs, but the only way I can best describe it is like a syrupy delivery at the low end (making it great for around town too), nice and torquey up until 4500rpm, then after that it feels like all hell is breaking loose, it literally flies up to the redline in a mad chorus of total and utter glorious raspiness, literally catapulting the car forward. :drunken:

As far as extra weight is concerned, there’s not much in it, well not noticeable anyway, according to Mr Paul Frere the 3.0 Carrera engine weighs the same a the original 2.0 engine, so if that weight is ok in a early swb then I’d say it’s totally fine for a lwb. I also changed all my shocks which has made the car handle ooh just about 75% better :shock: , so it’s even harder to tell if the back’s any heavier now, but once you point the car in the direction you want it to go and floor it, there's no fishtailing is just bites and goes for it. pure joy :evil: :evil:

Oil temp is up a bit, so a wing mounted cooler/thermostat & lines are now on the shopping list over the winter, I’m also using the 11 blade fan from the 2.2 which has a larger pulley, so is probably running a bit slower and contributing to the higher temps.

I’ve been fortunate enough to have an absolute top bloke on board giving the engine a top end rebuild as well, who was also good enough to let me use all of his equipment to clean things up and get it looking nice while he did all of the harder stuff. I’m not shy of a set of spanners but there’s no doubt I would have struggled to do this at home, lack of space and equipment :wink: , Once I’ve got a bigger set up I’d be fairly happy to attempt this kind of thing myself.

So to sum it up, am I happy with my engine swap? not many ! Smiles for miles, this is going to be a real fun car to drive, Dyno can confirm after this afternoon’s quick passenger run around Kew, always great to see you buddy and I hope you have a totally brilliant trip.

Would I advise anyone to do the same? Yes absolutely, I thoroughly recommend it if you want a bit more power, like me can’t afford that 2.4s or 2.7RS spec engine and don’t mind a bit of time off the road, then this is the way to go IMHO, if you have the option of keeping your old motor, as I am, then do, everything can be changed back if you want to sell the car.

phew.. anyway that's my waffle over, I’m off on my jolly holidays for 2 weeks now, and already can’t wait to get back to wind this sucker up.

Here’s a gratuitous pic of the engine bay, note the backdated heat (before fan belt fitted, oh and a new breather pipe is on order :lol: )

Image
Darren
71 911T with C3 motor
Gone in 60 seconds
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 2:19 am
Location: Oxford
Contact:

Post by Gone in 60 seconds »

Fantastic job Darren, looks like a sperbly executed install..I found the 3.0l wondefully torquey..
73 911 RS(T) #0968
Bertroex
DDK 1st, 2nd and 3rd for me!
Posts: 2051
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Brewood, Staffs

Post by Bertroex »

Gone in 60 seconds wrote:I found the 3.0l wondefully torquey..

I can only second that (says the man who blew his engine)

A c3 lump in comparison to a late SC lump is more revvy ......
-1968 912 SWB Targa LHD
-1976 911 Carrera 3.o Targa RHD
-1983 944 190bhp (Augment Automotive enhanced) RHD
-1993 964 C4 Jubi RHD
-1979 280SLC manual LHD, 1989 500SL, 1997 SL500,
Ex 1976 911 2.7 Targa, 1979 911 SC, 1983 930, etc
Gary71
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 10689
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 1:27 pm
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Post by Gary71 »

Lovely job, sound like a great combination Maybe one day I will bow to the desire for power :lol:
User avatar
hot66
Moderator
Posts: 19179
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:17 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Post by hot66 »

looks superb 8)

Can't wait to see it blasting around Elvington on the DDK trackday :)
James

1973 911 2.4S
1993 964 C2
2010 987 Spyder

1963 Honda C100 Supercub

Its not how fast you go, but how you go fast ;)
1972_911t
DDK forever
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by 1972_911t »

Nice work makes me even more eager to get my 3.2 rebuilt for transplant into my 72. One Q: did you swap your fuel pump from the back to the front as it would be in the original 3.0 are did you mount it at the rear as I would be on your early car?

Steve
1972 911t RS Styled + G50 Converted
SAAB 9-3ss Aero
Dyno Soar
I luv DDK!
Posts: 994
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 10:16 am
Location: London, England

Post by Dyno Soar »

I hooked up with darren yesterday and went for a blast in his red missile. I can only say that this engine is awesome, sounds so nice and revs SO clean. :drunken:

We went for a blast round the block in Kew and my face was :) thenDarren laid the pedal to the metal and I was like :shock: this engine screams!! I must say I felt alittle inadequate and started to wonder if my black monster could handle this Banshie of a engine on a run. :evil:

Mean and pretty at the same time, this car has been put togeather so well. Money well spent the car has been transformed, I know its a cliche' but hell fellas since driving my black 911 I'm not that easy to impress.

Any of you guys looking for a performance upgrade for your early car I would seriously consider this conversion. In my opinion it looks better then the late 3.2 like I have as its more in keeping with the 70's.

Awesome car, awesome dude.. really happy for you Darren its a 'REAL' Porsche performance car now. We will have to go for a drive in the new year when I am back from Oz!!!!

:drunken:
Alam

77' 911 Carerra 3.0 'The Beast'
58' 356-A Coupe
55' Chevy
51' AP17
MdR
Moderator
Posts: 2089
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 4:19 pm
Location: East Preston, West Sussex

Post by MdR »

That is one clean looking engine bay.
Well done 8)
Martin Rogers
+44 (0)7812 167547
'69 Ossi blue warmrod 3.0 911T
[sold & sorely missed]'67S '70 Targa T '75 914/4 x 2
stevieboy
Married to the DDK
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 10:06 pm
Location: Isleworth/Essex

Post by stevieboy »

Well done Darren looks great and by all accounts goes well.


But



Stick a big fat pair of Webers on it like mine, then see what happens.


:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

By the way have a good trip, catch up when your back will be back on the scene then.
Steve



Size 9.5 Boots
BS
DDK Seasoned Poster
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:01 pm

Post by BS »

great to read! since my 3.0 will be going in the 1973 911 to... TODAY THE rs carpets in two weeks the engine...
Gilbert '71 T
I luv DDK!
Posts: 894
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 9:12 am
Location: N London

Post by Gilbert '71 T »

1972_911t wrote: One Q: did you swap your fuel pump from the back to the front as it would be in the original 3.0
Steve
Yes Steve I have relocated the fuel pump to the front (different pump), just on the outside of the smugglers box, i believe porsche did this to prevent vapour lock on the cis system when hot, you can buy the mounting kit from AFN for around £20, need two people to mount it though, one to hold it from underneath and the other to sit inside the hood to tighten it up inside the box. good luck with the 3.2 swap, that is going to be something 8) you'll love it i promise.

Thanks for the kind words everyone, especially Alam, mate your vocal delight on my first blat was priceless... yeeee-haaaaaw :lol:, you know I value your opinion as well, and your comments confirm the positive difference, makes it even all the more worth while. don't think it's quite there with the 'Black Beast' but there's only one way to find out :wink:

I have just got back from one last drive before I pack up for my holiday, and just wanted to say that the car just seems to get better and better, i'm really happy with it.

signing off now for 2 weeks :hello2:
Darren
71 911T with C3 motor
fetuhoe
DDK rules my life!
Posts: 1044
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:06 pm
Location: Midlands

3.0 litre

Post by fetuhoe »

Will the 901/911 box handle the torque of the 3.0 litre it may be unreliable in the medium/long term.
Mat2.2t
DDK Fanatic
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:47 pm
Location: UK

Post by Mat2.2t »

Sounds like a fantastic car you got there Darren.

Look forward to seeing it powering its way around the area!
Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 17942
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Post by Lightweight_911 »

A very clean installation Darren - well done.

Beware though, you've embarked on the 'slippery slope' - more than one Porsche, engine upgrade, etc ... :wink:

Have a good holiday.
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
saxon
DDK forever
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 4:41 pm
Location: Kelvedon North Essex

Post by saxon »

Well done Darren the engine bay looks fantastic top job . 8) 8)
2010 mini mayfair cooper s
1999 mini cooper works s




Peter
Post Reply