911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

For classic Porsche 911 content

Moderators: hot66, impmad2000, Barry, Viv_Surby, Derek, Mike Usiskin

Lightweight_911
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 16928
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:48 pm
Location: Worcs/W Mids border

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by Lightweight_911 »

Any 911-based replica - whether 911R, T/R, ST, RS or RSR - will typically be worth more money if the donor shell is from the correct model year.

Although earlier 2.7RS models were built in the second half of 1972, they were '73 models built using '73 model year shells.
Andy

“Adding power makes you faster on the straights;
- subtracting weight makes you faster everywhere”
Mick Cliff
I need to get out more!
Posts: 3277
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:51 am
Location: Selby

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by Mick Cliff »

IMO there would be no doubt as to its' authenticity.
The current case was sourced by Bob Watson on behalf of Phil Taysom when the engine was fully rebuilt.
PT was an aficionado regarding RS's

Confusingly, the previous engine in the car was reputed also to be a genuine RS..... although there was some slight evidence of overstamping of the number.

The earlier RS engine was replaced due to the case having a porosity problem which was deemed uneconomical to repair

Both engines went like hot snot though!
Merc B Class diesel
Porsche-less
manipou
DDK addict
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:53 pm

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by manipou »

Photo taken at Coys

Image
1972 911 2.4T
1991 964 RS
1983 Renault 5 Turbo 2
manipou
DDK addict
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:53 pm

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by manipou »

Looks different to the genuine numbers I have seen, in particular the spacing and the 0.

Image
Image
Image
1972 911 2.4T
1991 964 RS
1983 Renault 5 Turbo 2
23e Heure
I used to have a life, then came DDK
Posts: 3745
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: London

911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by 23e Heure »

Superlight7 wrote: I'm likely wrong and sure there will be a que of experts to tell me but were some early RS.s not built on 72 shells.
You would say that :lol:
James
'87 R4 GTL Clan
'74 914/6 3.0 Texas GT
'73 911 2.7 RS Replica LHD
'72 911 2.4 E RHD (Sold)
Image
majordad
I luv DDK!
Posts: 995
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 6:05 pm
Location: Co. Cork. Ireland

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by majordad »

I've raced a number of 911s , most fitted with genuine RS motors. 20 yrs ago it was all about using what came easiest after the original one blew up. There was no value or worth then to any great extent. Like war , you just did what had to be done to get through the next week.
An RS replica can be a great 911 to drive, and an RSR 2.8 one better still.
1972 2.4S, since 1988
993 RSR Cup
73 RS Rep Race
2018 GT3RS Lizard
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 19025
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by 911hillclimber »

Indeed, you cannot judge/evaluate everything on today's 'view' when looking at actions from the past.

My humble bitza hot rod has had 3 engines along the way from 1988. In 1992 I needed a bigger/better engine to be faster on the hillclimbs, so built a 2.4E/S on mech inj=180bhp.
7R cases and all that but it was just another engine. I sold it to an Irish man for £1000 and bought a 3.2 to go faster on the hill climbs etc for £2K with it's sports cooled box.

These engines came from old porsches, nothing special, but the 2.4 was from an E with all stock parts and S p&b.

It would be a very prized engine today; then it was £200 in bits but complete.

As to this car, if the buyer saw it, fancied it, he has paid what he is comfortable with so all involved are happy.
If the engine is/isn't a real 2.7 RS then that will be for the buyer to come to terms with, he made the decision to buy?

Don't you take this risk via an auction purchase?
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
PhilipB
DDK slapper chatter
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Oxford

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by PhilipB »

That number does look dodgy. Shouldn't really affect the value of the car though unless you were thinking of selling the engine to an RS owner....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Philip
User avatar
dugsud
Married to the DDK
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:10 pm
Location: York

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by dugsud »

Doug Sudron
83' 911SC
Triumph Tiger 1050
manipou
DDK addict
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:53 pm

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by manipou »

Basically the car sold for the correct price for what it was, it looks like a cracking car and will be a bunch of fun.

Given the description that Coys used, I think the question was, why was the car so cheap?

My friend who went to buy the car would have paid a lot more than the sale price had he been happy with the engine number. He said a real engine would be worth what the whole car sold for.

Takes nothing away from the car, and the fact that it was still a lot of car for the money. Hope the new owner just uses it and enjoys it.
1972 911 2.4T
1991 964 RS
1983 Renault 5 Turbo 2
964RS
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 6495
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Midlands
Contact:

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by 964RS »

An RS engine is now over £90k then?

The car sold at right price...bit more than a year ago.

The people who benefited the most were Coys.
----------------------------------------------------
Jason
https://www.SweepingHand.co.uk
Rolex & Omega Watch Purchases & Sales

Image
User avatar
Darren65
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 7873
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: North Wiltshire
Contact:

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by Darren65 »

964RS wrote:.....
The people who benefited the most were Coys.
.....I'd say it's the new owner! 8)
gridgway
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 5715
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:59 pm

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by gridgway »

That's confusing. Do you think at 90k it was cheap, expensive or just right?
manipou wrote:Basically the car sold for the correct price for what it was, it looks like a cracking car and will be a bunch of fun.

Given the description that Coys used, I think the question was, why was the car so cheap?

My friend who went to buy the car would have paid a lot more than the sale price had he been happy with the engine number. He said a real engine would be worth what the whole car sold for.

Takes nothing away from the car, and the fact that it was still a lot of car for the money. Hope the new owner just uses it and enjoys it.
911hillclimber
Nurse, I think I need some assistance
Posts: 19025
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: West Midlands

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by 911hillclimber »

Surely it was just right as that is what it was worth on the day.
£90k for a real RS engine?
£90 k maybe if the engine is the right one for the engine less RS you have in the garage!

The escalation of these things is ridiculous, but maybe someone will pay it, one of the new Middle Classes mentioned above?
73T 911 Coupe, road/hillclimber 3.2L
Lola t 492 / 3.2 hillclimb racer
Boxster 987 Gen II 2.9
manipou
DDK addict
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:53 pm

Re: 911 2.7rs Rep at Coys

Post by manipou »

gridgway wrote:That's confusing. Do you think at 90k it was cheap, expensive or just right?
I think it was the right money and a good fun car.

If the 663 engine number was original then I think it would have sold for a lot more. I don't know what an original 663 engine is worth, only what I know someone said they would pay.

Similar car sold for £100K with a 664 engine a few weeks ago. https://www.silverstoneauctions.com/197 ... recreation

I think most people, or at least me, thought the Coys car was cheap until I saw the engine number stamping last night...
1972 911 2.4T
1991 964 RS
1983 Renault 5 Turbo 2
Post Reply