What is the current equivalent of the Digilux 2 and is it any good? Sounds like the sort of thing I need but i'm a little hesitant buying a 10 yr old camera from an unknown source. I am also guessing there have been some useful advances over the 10 year period although I appreciate that doesn't always mean a better camera or better pictures!
There is a lot of good cameras out there but nothing quite like the D2 as a package (warts 'n' all). It has the feel, with it's lens mounted controls, of a film camera but more recent equivalents use interchangeable lenses and come with a hefty price tag.
The quality and quantity of glass is obvious in your hand and therefore the sensor is the bottleneck (often the reverse these days). Above all, it is fun to use.
yoda wrote:What is the current equivalent of the Digilux 2 and is it any good?
As Bruce says, there's nothing quite like it on the market today.
If you can, I'd wait until Photokina (Sept), you can bet Leica will have an all new system launched at the show.
It will be pricey but less than the M-rangefinder. Could be very nice.
Paul
'74 Porsche 911 Carrera 2.7 (MFI) - Lime Green
'94 Porsche 911 Carrera 2 (993) - Mexico Blue
Thanks both. Sounds like it might be the way to go as I suspect a new offering from Leica may be more than I want to spend. I'll keep an eye out for a good example. Is there a way to identify an example with the sensor issue rectified other than seeing evidence of replacement by Leica? e.g. is there a build number / date after which cameras had the fault rectified before being sold?
Most, if not all had the weak sensor. Most have had the sensor replaced and few have any evidence. However, Leica will still replace any original sensors that fail. Panasonic are unlikely to, so the one on eBay (lc1) with only a few exposures on the "clock" isn't the best choice.
Thinking about it, the closest alternative in a new camera (at sub £1K) would be the fuji x range.
Still quite a few differences between them and the D2 but 1/2 hours research will identify those. In summary, the X10 has the same size sensor as the D2 (but 12mp) and a similar zoom but a basic glass viewfinder so you may need to use the LCD more often. The X100 has a fixed lens and bigger sensor along with a clever hybrid viewfinder.
The fujis are now easy available with heavy discounting so seem good value right now.
I'd quite like a X100 myself but the fixed lens is a bit restrictive for me.